Violence Politics Subject
Politics Confusion Violence Physical
attacks Assassinations
Gerhard Kaučić
Philosopher, Feminist, Mediator, Author, Freerider, born 1959, Dr. phil., age 66, 2025
Head of a Philosophical Practice in Vienna (Austria) since 1989
Anna Lydia Huber
Philosopher, Feminist, Mediator, Author, Freerider, born 1959, MSc, age 66, 2025
Associate in the grammatological Philosophical Practice since 2009 in Vienna and beyond
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
Violence Politics Subject
Politics Confusion Violence Physical attacks Assassinations
MISLEADED and CONFUSED, sexists,
racists, fascists, attackers, assassins, AN ATTEMPT.
Misguided
and confused harassers, sexists, users of (sexual) violence, ideologically
religious fanatics, racists and humiliators, assassins, misanthropists,
fascists of all countries, go into meditation, reflection and analysis!
Sexual
economies, desire,
willingness to use violence, perpetration, responsibility!!!
Desire
and responsibility!
Sexual
economies! The possibilities of being born to the end!!!
the secret
of the communicative in the constantly
threatening incommunicability
Sexism.
Racism. Religious fanaticism. Fascism. Murder.
Adaptations.
Philosophical
processes.
Slow,
concentrated reading.
Analysis.
Reflectorium. Psychoanalysis.
Possibilities
for identity dislocation. Deconstruction.
Becoming a subject.
Being born to the end.
Repeated !
Dear readers
Dear visitors to our Grammatological
Philosophical Practice in Vienna and everywhere
else: Stay confident and: Stay with us!
This is a construction site,
surrounded by a forest and countless trains of thought, explorations,
reconnaissance missions, illuminations, consolidations, dis- and parkours,
analyses, tasks, target explorations, planning, localizations, dislocations,
deconstructions and attempted climbs to sometimes undreamt-of heights far
beyond the general horizon of the conceivable. It is always a great pleasure
for us.
Best regards
Gerhard Kaučić, Anna Lydia Huber (Dr. phil., MSc, born 1959, Age 66,
2025)
( More
in the posts here in the blog on the subject of
the assassination and on the subject of sexism and in the magazine (online)
Freitag )
Briefly outlined in extreme brevity
and complexity. The political body !
Self-empowerment!
Desire as an
effect of socio-historical power relations!
Power and
domination relations connect individual, social, physical and virtual bodies.
Everything
takes place where the ground opens up to the abyss, where the justification of
something is attracted by countless abysses. ParaNoia lives as long as there will be
libido. We must contain it, not rationalize it, contain and nurture it, in
other words civilize and educate it.
Desire always moves through all the
specific categories of power that make up a geo-historical context (Elspeth
Probyn 1996), albeit unique and singular. Society as a tracing (Derrida) of
“relational singularities” (Probyn).
Identity
dislocations,
chorology, hyle/morphic structures as tangible/not real(!) moments of
experience (Husserl, Derrida).
The
possible self
(Hochschild 1999) is an idealized and unrealized part of one's own
existence. The images and role models(!) of our cultures form the connection
between our possible selves.
For
example, you can drink up your courage in company and “let off steam”
when drunk, the possible self of a macho man as a “drunken assailant” and
“aggressor”. The heroes(!) of touching and groping, of mocking and raping, of
self-empowerment intoxication and the sadistic pleasure of humiliating and
distressing, of torturing and murdering!
What is important here is that although the possible self usually remains virtual, it is nevertheless a special moment of self-understanding! An affective occupation takes place in the possible self. Since this usually appears desirable (for whatever reason, this is solely due to the biographical development of the individual), ideas and feelings of the most peculiar kind arise, i.e. the possible self is formed into a mode of diverse identifications and formations of desire.
The absurd
train of thought of religious fanatics to be able to do justice to God, to be
able to enter his “eternal”, his paradise, yes, to save themselves from hell
and to be able to erase their own previous misdeeds (such as criminal offenses)
through the “heroic”(!!!) act of murdering so-called non-believers or people of
other faiths.
And this is
just one variant of crude thought processes and the resulting acts or
assassinations among many other self-seductions with underlying afflictions ( cf. our Posting
on Affizierung:
Affizierung
Immunisierung Autoaffektion Autoimmunität
engl. Version:
Affliction Immunization Autoaffection Autoimmunity
Gropers,
mockers, humiliators, rapists, murderers and assassins should learn to rebuild
themselves by working on their desires and dreams and thus learn to see their
own past in a different light and, above all, learn to see themselves in the
light of others.
On the
contrary, they usually work on so-called cavalier justifications to ward off
criticism from the outside. They usually form themselves as a possible self in
the form of a promise of their specialness. After all, they only mean well,
according to the outflow of a stupid culture of incomprehension for
humiliations of all kinds (of the other). Trumpism! The new vocabulary for this
kind of posturing.
They don't
want to be able to recognize that they have turned their “normal lives” into
deviance and depravity.
Individuality
and responsibility!
Not an easy
path. Not a very difficult path!
Desire and
responsibility!
Possible
careers from thoughtlessness(!?), rudeness, being rejected(!), feelings of
hatred, exclusion, sexism, sexual harassment, coercion, the crude, racism, hate
speech, violence, rape, cruelty, torture, fascism, inclusion, mobbing to murder
(?!!!), serial murder, mass murder, genocide, extermination!!!
The dominance of the other as a
consequence of the lack of doubt.
The
Political Body and
the Other
Afflictions
Inskriptions
Recollections
Individuality
and responsibility! Not an easy path. Not a very difficult path!
Politics,
ways of thinking, acts of communication, territorializations, deterritorializations
(cf. Deleuze!), deconstructivisms, constructivisms.
Dehierarchizations,
displacements, identity dislocations, chorology, hyle/morphe structures
as tangible/not real(!) moments of experience (Husserl, Derrida), sensual(!)
matter experienced(!) or shaped(!) in différance.
The
Political Body and the Other
Affections
Inscriptions
Recollections
Every
democracy, every democracy to come, will have to deal with these energy
arrangements(!) (libido wasters) of irrational, slightly to severely paranoid
megalomaniac personalities over and over again. Not
born to the end (cf. Theweleit,
Männerphantasien)!
The
bodily architecture
is political (cf. Monique Wittig's analysis of heterosexuality as
a political regime and Michel Foucault's analyses of the dispositif
of sexuality as well as Judith Butler's analyses of performative
identity).
Bodies
are socially constructed texts (cf. Beatriz/Paul Preciado's Contrasexual Manifesto).
Consciousness
arises from bodies in structures.
Actions are founded in delusions in dreams
and as dreams.
In
psychosis, the father function is reduced to the image of the father.
The
symbolic is reduced to the imaginary. Under certain real conditions, the person
lives his dream as madness set in action - he follows his puzzling image of the
father. His rebus remains closed to him. He does not know distance to himself.
He does not recognize a real self in relation to the other. Relational shifts.
Distortions. Delusions of grandeur. I/ME as God! Imagination as
the unshakeable necessity of a self. Trumputinism.
Lacan
defines psychosis as one of three clinical structures defined by the mechanism
of decomposition.
In this
mechanism, the “name-of-the-father” (cf. “Introduction to the
name-of-the-father”, - in: Jacques Lacan: Name-of-the-Father. Vienna 2006,
translated from the French by Hans-Dieter Gondek, Vlg. Turia+Kant, pp. 63-102,
german edition) is not integrated into the psychotic's symbolic universe; a gap
remains. There was a “rejection/decomposition”!
In
psychosis there is indeed an unconscious, but according to Lacan a
non-functioning unconscious. In other words, a gap or a hole in the symbolic
order for lack of the name-of-the-father, a dysfunction of the unconscious,
perhaps better a parafunction of the unconscious. The psychotic
structure arises due to a dysfunction of the Oedipus complex, a lack of the
father function.
“Dream
and delusion come from the same source, from the repressed; the dream is
the physiological delusion, so to speak, of the normal person. Before the
repressed has become strong enough to assert itself as a delusion in waking
life, it can easily have achieved its first success under the more favorable
circumstances of the sleeping state in the form of a dream with a lasting
effect. For during sleep, with the reduction of psychic activity in general,
there is also a reduction in the strength of the resistance which the
prevailing psychic powers put up against the repressed. It is this reduction
that makes the formation of dreams possible, and it is for this reason that the
dream becomes for us the best access to knowledge of the unconscious sphere (of
the soulic/the psychical). The only difference is that the dream usually
vanishes again with the establishment of the psychic occupations of waking, the
ground won by the unconscious is cleared again.” (S. Freud, The Delusion and
the Dreams in W. Jensen's Gradiva, Chapter 2)
(( Compare also and especially Jacques Lacan, Nicolas Abraham/Maria Torok “Kryptonymie. Das Verbarium des Wolfsmanns” and Jacques Derrida ‘Fors’ (tr. from the French Werner Hamacher), Basel 2008 (especially p.71ff. ‘Einverleibung, interne Hysterie, Kryptonymie’ and p. 94 ff. ”Die interne Hysterie. Structure and functioning of a machinery” (germ. Ed.)
Lacan is
not agreed here by Abraham/Torok/Derrida that the wolf-man is merely a
neurotic, but in truth a psychotic whose “distortions” are not accessible to
symbolization!!!! ( keyword Trumputin! ).
In and through
“cryptonymy”, the questions of philosophy (especially those of J. Derrida,
which are still being increasingly extensified and disseminated in a
concentrated manner) are posed as hard as nails on the level of psychoanalysis,
and it is precisely on this level of psychoanalysis that philosophy is
categorically and grammatologically denied the possibility of an answer.
Possible careers from thoughtlessness(!?), rudeness, being rejected(!),
feelings of hatred, exclusion, sexism, sexual harassment, coercion, the crude,
racism, hate speech, violence, rape, cruelty, torture, fascism, inclusion,
mobbing to
murder (?!!!), serial murder, mass murder,
genocide, extermination!!!!
Democracy,
politics and society are threatened by assassination, by the assassins.
Threatened by border crossers of an erroneous belief, trapped in the paranoia
of fatal certainties up to a megalomania of a historically invented IS state (Kant's
“false poetic imagination” in the interpretation, assessment and
interpretation of signs of realities; see Immanuel Kant: Anthropologie in
pragmatischer Absicht, 1798, § 49).
In his
writing, Kant speaks of a “methodical madness”, of the ability to “race with
reason”, of the paranoia of the soul and the mind, which would be able to
think according to the laws of logic with the wrong “data” in the form
of hyper-reason.
And if only to understand how to move in traffic with an automobile and pull the lever of an automatic rifle.
How can the
reasonableness of reason be provided in contrast to crazy ideas and
actions? In Kant's “Critique of Pure
Reason” (Darmstadt 1983, vol. 3, p. 35) there is a criterion of
“self-knowledge”, the critical examination of ideas. So-called critical
reason places itself in a relationship to itself, in particular in order to
“cut off the root of enthusiasm and superstition” (ibid.). According to Kant,
this kind of rapture is “a delusion” (I. Kant, Kritik der Urteilskraft, vol. 8,
p. 366, germ. Ed.) beyond all limits of sensuality. Reason must
therefore keep this process of paranoia, i.e. the “rush of reason”, under
control or prevent it (ibid.).
Pardon!
Intermediate
step towards consciousness-expanding reading on the topic!
When it
comes to sexism, racism, fascism (!), let us always consult and not forget ---
the fascism analyses and sexual economy theories of Wilhelm Reich
("Massenpsychologie des Faschismus. Zur Sexualökonomie der
politischen Reaktion und zur proletarischen Sexualpolitik“ 1933 ) and Klaus
Theweleit (”Männerphantasien” 1980, esp. vol. 2 ‘männerkörper - zur
psychoanalyse des weißen terrors’ 1978 )
Pardon!
Once again
on the possible career on the road to death:
Read
slowly! With
caution and measuring the weight of the words!
Sexism
debates! Sexism! And!
- the secret of the communicative in the constantly
threatening incommunicability
Inconsiderateness(!?),
rudeness, being rejected(!?), feelings of hatred, exclusion, sexism, sexual
harassment, coercion, the crude, racism, hate speech, violence, rape, cruelty,
torture, fascism, inclusion, mobbing, murder, serial murder, mass murder, genocide,
extinction, death, social death, self-extinction, silence,
eternal
silence
inhumanity
no soul
finis
terrae
fin
f abyss
??? !!!
“What is a
crypt? (same volume p. 11, 12) ...
.......
Reversing
the order of questions, no longer considering the name crypt to be a metaphor
in the usual sense, this will perhaps mean moving from psychoanalysis and
within it from a new cryptology to an anasemic radical semantic change that
psychoanalysis has introduced into language>> (Nicolas Abraham/Maria
Torok: “L'écorce et le noyau”. Paris 1978 ))
The
politics of love and friendship. Only those who love can know what it means to
love.
Respect,
---
from a new cryptology to an anasemic
retranscription of all
concepts
Lost and
confused people of all countries, practise the geography
of
respectful behavior!
Sexual
economies!
Desire and
responsibility!
“The Sense
of the World” (Jean-Luc Nancy)
“Responsibility
of Sense” ( in: J.-L. Nancy, Das nackte Denken, Zurich, Berlin 2014, pp.
201-213 )
“Corpus” (
cf.!, read!,- absolutely !: J. - L. Nancy ! )
“This
thinking is maddening. ... the repulsion of the world is the world. Such is the
world of the body. It has in itself this disarticulation, this inarticulation
of the corpus.” (Corpus, p. 94) !!! Violence and the body !!! Violence and
impossible thinking !!! Body-speaking !!! Touching !!! Madness !!! Delusion !!!
Sense !!! Paranoia ???
“The
Primacy of the Same or Narcissism” (Emmanuel Lévinas: The Trace of the Other,
p. 167, p. 217, germ. ed.). “The senseless suffering” (hes., - in: Between us.
Mch. 1995, p. 117ff.). “Touch anxiety” as the cause of the lack of a sense of
plurality and otherness (Antje Kapust: Berührung ohne Berührung. Mch. 1999).
“But a
twofold law: YOU MUST TOUCH; YOU MUST NOT TOUCH AT ALL.” ((Jacques Derrida:
Touching, Jean-Luc Nancy. Bln. 2007, p. 2, pp. 87-94 “For there is a law
of tact. ... This law of the law ... What thus commands us respect, and above
all respect in the Kantian sense, ... where it is first of all respect for the
law, ... ”; p. 117 “Separation of the Other”; --- cf. on this “The Separation
of Lovers” by Igor A. Caruso; --- and further in touching on
JacquesDerridaJean-LucNancy through reading and lekriture: p. 145ff., p.
277ff., p. 339ff., germ. ed. )).
“...
Consequence of the castration fright ...” (Sigmund Freud: Die
Ichspaltung im Abwehrvorgang, - in: S. Freud, Das Ich und das Es. Metapsychological Writings. Frf. a.
Main 2010, p. 339 prev.f., germ. ed.).
For S.
Freud, too, the moment of the “prohibition”(!) of touch is considered to
be the predominant cause of neurosis (S. Freud, Totem und Tabu, - in: S. Freud:
Werkausgabe in 2 Bden, ed. by Anna Freud, Frf. 1978, II, P. 224, germ ed.).
The touch
through “oneself”(!) The touch of the other without touch. Touching by the
other without touching! Bodies speak body-speak. Sense of sense and sense of
the senses. Sense of the world. Writing of the world. Violence of writing.
Writing of violence ( see teaser and our blog posts, - especially: “Charlie
Hebdo” ! ).
The writing
of the “soul” as a tendentially boundless “body of pleasure” and “body of
pain”! --- cf. Jean-Luc Nancy
in “Ausdehnung der Seele” (Zurich-Berlin 2015, germ. ed.), p. 33ff. “Der Lustkörper”; p. 39: “The
pleasure body (and the pain body as its counterpart) delimits the body. It is
its transcendence.” ... p. 39: “In sex, bodies express a vocation to transcend
all destiny that would be subject to a given order.” !!! ...
“That is
why sex is the place of creation: ... And this starting from nothing,
that is, solely through the wide opening of that which in itself is nothing
other than opening: mouth, eye, ear, nose, sex, anus, skin, skin endlessly
repeated and reopened through all its pores. Distancing, wasting, taking and
detaching, coming and going, masturbating: always the syncopated cadence of a
process that drives towards the limits of what first and foremost limits
a body.”
Relationality
between fear of touching and touching. Relationship. Body language.
Sense of sense and sense of the senses. Sense of the world. Writing of the
world. Lovers! Killers! Violence of scripture! The writing of the soul!
[ This is a
construction site, see more in the posts on the assassination and on
sexism in the blog and in the magazine Freitag ]
Vergessen
wir nicht ! ! !
Let us not forget ! ! !
Die
Psychoanalyse ! ! !
The Psychoanalysis ! ! !
P.s.:
[[ als kleine Info hinzugefügt am Schluß:
Nicht jeder
Mensch kann und will in die Öffentlichkeit mit persönlichen und gleichzeitig
politisch-gesellschaftlichen Leidensthematiken.
Die Philosophische Praxis bietet hierfür den geeigneten Ort und wie ich denke
eine geeignete, weil angemessene intellektuelle Intimität des behutsamen,
mikrologischen Gespräches zwischen zwei Menschen. Face à Face. Open End.
P.s.:
[[ as a little info added at the end:
Not everyone can and wants
to go public with personal and at the same time political-social issues of
suffering.
Philosophical practice
offers a suitable place for this and, in my opinion, an appropriate
intellectual intimacy of careful, micro-logical conversation between two
people. Face to face. Open End.
To speak briefly with Derrida, to remind us how necessary this will
always be:
The subject of an utterance can hardly be aware, and must be aware, that
all “communication” is subject to a general graphematic structure.
One consequence of this is that the iteration structure is given and
thus the intention of an utterance can never be fully present to itself and its
content. This means that the iteration always produces a break, the iteration
structures
a p r i o r i.
There is always already an oratio obliqua, a structural unconsciousness
of intention in the actuality of the statement.
Never forget to remember that in the matter and the conception of it a
ghost is at work - the teleological illusion of consciousness (cf. esp.
“Signature, Event, Context” by J. Derrida, in: Randgänge der Philosophie).
This also applies, and perhaps even more so, to the actor of a hate
speech than to the addressee.
So watch out for the always possible boomerang effect of self-harm! In
private as well as in public!
Whether individual person-actor or states.
It is always important to read and critique the connotations of a text.
For Rousseau, as for Artaud,
words are “corpses of psychic language”.
The theater of cruelty calls from
the grave. The phenomena of this theater are screams, pantomimes, glossopoeias
and onomatopoeias, which perhaps make the human body visible in its misery.
This visibility (!?) shows us an
early human era as Rousseau tried to imagine it. No paradisiacal world, no
lovable “natural man”(!).
Articulation is no longer a cry,
but neither is discourse, where repetition, and with it language itself, is
almost impossible (cf. Derrida, Die Schrift und die Differenz, p. 362f.).
Jacques Derrida has pointed out
that Artaud, with his dramatic breathing, screaming, moving, not only follows
on from Rousseau's primal language of affects, but also from Freud's conception
of dream language, which, out of “consideration for representability”, abandons
word concepts in favor of a kind of immediate pictorial writing (ibid., pp.
365ff. and especially J. D.: Artaud Moma. Ausrufe, Zwischenruf und
Berufungen, Passagen Verlag, p. 13ff., germ. ed. and see also Concic-Kaucic,
Sem II, Passagen Verlag, 1994, germ. ed.).
Artaud seeks the real, the raw
flesh.
We also see this design very
often on the net, in social media. The raw! Not very often the cooked!
The raw! The hate - speak! The
raw! The rape! The raw! The assassination!
Paranoia! Conspiracies of
meaning! Diseases in the head! (Kant)
Pardon!
Once again to the possible career on the way to death
Inconsiderateness(!?), rudeness, being rejected(!?), feelings of hatred,
exclusion, sexism, sexual harassment, coercion, the crude, racism, hate speech,
violence, rape, cruelty, torture, fascism, inclusion, mobbing, murder, serial
murder, mass murder, genocide, extinction, death, social death,
self-extinction, silence,
eternal silence
inhumanity
no soul
finis terrae
fin
f abyss
Destructive
developments are not only to be repressively eliminated(!), but also to be
pedagogized and civilized through communicative inclusion. Philosophical Practice
could make a not insignificant contribution to this, I think.
I must also
briefly mention >responsibility< (!). This touches on becoming a
subject, the ability to be a subject, thus also the discourses on the
demarcation between humans and animals (see teaser!).
I would
like to point out the general disquiet in the human sciences when one addresses
a logic of the unconscious or even relies on it (as I/we do, for
example).
A logic of
the unconscious that undermines every certainty and assurance (including our
own!) in the awareness of freedom (!), which then always implies responsibility.
Here the
reproach is immediately raised that (with the inclusion of this logic of the
unconscious) all responsibility and ethics would be called into doubt and thus
every decision (and also a little bit of non-decidability) would be
guaranteed.
I keep
telling those who make this accusation that the opposite is precisely the case,
that it is precisely this fact of doubt about responsibility, decidability and
one's own ethical being that constitutes the indeterminable nature(!) of
responsibility, decision and ethics.
We not only
react, we respond. Linguistically, semiotically. In a certain way, this
response (with certain signs, codes) should also apply to certain animals (see
also my teaser).
The
function of language is not only to provide information.
In speaking
I seek the answer of the other. The possibility of becoming a subject
lies in what I say and ask and in my doubts.
Humans (and
to some extent animals) are not Cartesian animal machines (!). Living beings do
not have completely pre-programmed behavior and interaction (especially not
when the observation period is extended over generations!).
Animals also possess subjectivity
and even to some extent a subconscious!
Any
established knowledge, any undoubted theoretical certainty would only further
assert and reinforce the old metaphysical prejudices of the mere “reaction”
instead of a possibility to respond(!) (i.e. to be able to “read”(!) -
means leeway, i.e. freedom, not being fixed as a mere animal machine, as a mere
reaction apparatus).
The
dominance of the Other as a consequence of the lack of doubt.
The Political Body and the Other
Afflictions
Inskriptions
Recollections
Please recognize this truth(!),
-
the factuality of your behavior
and that means
that you must bear
responsibility at all times and without interruption for possibly tipping your
completely “normal life” into deviance and depravity by virtue of your behavior
and according to your actions.
In the negative as well as in
the positive!
The world
today has become a single large space, the likes of which Plato and all
his successors up to the 20th century could not have dreamed of (!).
But this
space, as Derrida points out several times, indeed many times and
explicitly, also has a quality unknown to them: hybrid in all its cultural
conditions, preconditions, determinations and shifts, - overlapping on all
sides, intensifying, overshooting, heterotopic, global and perhaps also coming
(!?!) planetary.
(( cf.
on this, - stimulatingly controversial: texts by Chantal Mouffe, Richard Rorty,
Simon Critchley, Ernesto Laclau and Jacques Derrida, - in: Chantal Mouffe (ed.):
Dekonstruktion und Pragmatismus. Democracy, Truth and Reason. Vienna 1999
(Passagen Vlg., german ed.) and Chantal Mouffe: Welche Weltordnung:
kosmopolitisch oder multipolar?, - in: Chantal Mouffe: Über das Politische.
Against the Cosmopolitan Illusion. Frankfurt am Main 2007, p. 118ff. (edition
suhrkamp, germ. ed.) and in particular: Jacques Rancière: Der Hass der
Demokratie. Berlin, August Verlag 2011, german edition; and: Colin Crouch:
Postdemokratie. Frankf. 2008; and finally Plato's “delicate” and
provocative (!?) formulations on democracy as a political regime that is not
one ( !?!), - in: Plato, Politeia, Book VIII, 562d ff. ))
The
thinking of différance (Derrida, Die différance, - in: Randgänge
der Philosophie, Vienna 1988, pp. 29-53, german ed.) is a thinking towards what can be!
[[ read our postings on attacks in
Paris (Charlie Hebdo, Bataclan), violence and sexism (debates), - perhaps something else should be
added here (after Orlando June 12, 2016, after Hamas attack on Israel on
October 7, 2023 (massacre during the Supernova Festival), et alii., ..., et
alii …, --- after Magdeburg, after
Munich, after Aschaffenburg, after Vienna, after attack in New Orleans in
January 2025, after Villach February 2025) ]]
The world
is changing. Always
has been. Paranoia (in Kant's sense) has always been unable to cope with
this. Paranoiacs with TNT belts, knives, pipe bombs and cars are scaring us
today.
The
unresolved conflicts in the Middle East, the Far East and Africa, continental
plate shifts in the post-colonial or neo-colonial (!?) age are coming to us in
the flesh (!). The Russian invasion of Ukraine. The long war against Ukraine.
Perhaps against Northern Europe. Perhaps against Eastern Europe. Maybe again in
the Balkans? New problems and new questions, new readings, new interpretations
every day.
Hundreds of
thousands of dead in the wars. 100s of deaths in the assassinations. Dozens
killed in the assassination. Each time the singularity of murder!
Together
with the historical processes, we must think the singularity.
No logic of
the simulacrum can make us forget this.
Being at
home or wanting to be at home is in danger of deterritorialization, even the
danger of expropriation.
A
decomposition of our sense of security.
Also a
certain devaluation of the state, insofar as sovereignty is linked to the rule
over a territory - and thus also the guarantee(ing) of security(s).
It happens
to me as a sceptic of the state - as someone who always tends to see the state
as someone who wants to block or roll back individualization, legalization and
democratization - that I am currently a little more on the side of the state.
Especially on the side of Europe, the European Union, to be precise!
In any
case, one thing seems obvious to me: without the desire “to be at home with
oneself” (Kant), there would be no hospitality ( cf. Jacques Derrida, This
crazy “truth”: the “right name” of friendship, - in: J. D.: Politik (sic!, cf.
French original: Politiques ...) der Freundschaft. Frankf. 2002
(Suhrkamp, germ. ed.), p. 80ff. and: J. D.: Von der Gastfreundschaft. Vienna 2001 (Passagen Verlag, german
ed.), p. 53ff. ).
We should
retain this vital desire without dragging the concepts of nationalism or even
fundamentalism of any kind through life with us.
The
assassination. The madness. The singularity.
The work
of mourning.
Telegrief. The assassination. The murderers. The victims. Me. Subjects.
Touching. Sad. In mourning.
Geophilosophy,
Ecopsychoanalysis, ( Rousseau, Kant, Nietzsche,
philosophy and movement in space, Nietzsche's philosophical geography, Husserl,
Merleau-Ponty, Horkheimer, Adorno, Foucault, Lyotard, Deleuze, Guattari,
Derrida, Fr. M. Wimmer, St. Günzel, D. Harvey, K. Schlögel, S. Weigel, B.
Neumann, Spivak : spatial theories, geographies, politics, ways of thinking,
acts of communication, territorializations, deterritorializations,
deconstructivisms, constructivisms, critical geopolitics(! ),
dehierarchizations, displacements, identity dislocations, chorology, hyle/morphe
structures as tangible/not real(!) moments of experience (Husserl,
Derrida), sensual(!) matter experienced(!) or shaped(!) in différance,
“planetary subject”, ‘animal turn’,
‘spatial turn’, philosophy of democracy, intercultural philosophy, human
rights, human duties
Philosophical Practice as grammatological philosophical Practice as
Austrian(!) Philosophy of the present! Philosophy today. Philosophizing. Deconstructing
in conversation. Deconstruction. Vienna,
Austria, Europe, the world. Regional and global. In the sense of thinking of a
“planetary subject” (cf. Spivak, below) with regional, cultural roots.
Regional, continental, global.
Austrian
philosophy of the present. Philosophies of the present. Philosophers today. Austrian philosophers today, in the
present, in Austria and in the world. Deconstruction
as a philosophical practice and attitude. Vienna, Austria, Europe, the world.
Geophilosophy. Critical geophilosophy. Intercultural Philosophy, Convivialism,
Multiculturalism, Interculturalism, Cosmopolitanism, New Cosmopolitanism, World
Philosophy, World Philosophy, Interculturality, Intercultural Communication,
Incommunicability, individual, familial, local, regional, global (!!!????)
No
historical process (of freedom, the Middle East, Europe, America, wars, oil,
money, weapons, colonialism, imperialism, religions, cultures, hegemonies,
uprisings, iterabilities of events of murder, expulsions, fleeing, reception
and rescue / non-rescue of refugees, mass murderers, war-lords, Taliban, IS
(Daesh), Arab Wahabism, Salafism / Salafism, Russism and other death ideologies
etc.) can make us forget the event / events. Wahhabism), Salafism / Salafism,
Russism and other death ideologies etc.) can make us forget the event / events.
Hundreds of
thousands of deaths in the wars. 100s of deaths in the assassinations. Dozens
of deaths from the assassination. Each time the singularity of the murder!
Together
with the processes of history, we must think the singularity.
((( Additional remark on the following “Mundus Corpus” as an insertion and
grafting:
Practice
and practices: What happens in a philosophical practice like ours. What happens
in a philosophical practice? What is a philosophical practice? What is
philosophical practice? ( see below in this blog post and see especially above
in the teaser ! ) What happens in my philosophical practice.
The
compact citation context text “Corpus” here (!) is owed to a lucid, precise and
concise reading accuracy and reading contemporaneity (strictly speaking only
almost/nearby!), - a kind of grammatological necessity of thought!
In
my grammatological philosophical practice, we do not formulate about something,
not about texts (what is said / not said / thought / interpreted / written /
drawn / filmed / meant / mediatized / realia of any kind) // (in relation and
reference to supposed truths of reality), but we process as precisely as
possible as readers of a text passage by reading it and subsequently analyzing
the concrete (! ) ( and only these! ) linguistic units and perpetual incessant
interrelation (!) of what is analyzed and its decoding by deconstructing as
many (!) implications, references, (un)thoughtfulnesses and the thinking of the
trace ( cf. teaser on grammatology and the trace: “The trace, in which the relationship to the
other emerges, expresses its possibility in the entire realm of being, which
metaphysics has determined as present-being from the hidden movement of the
trace.
It is
necessary to think the trace before the existing. ... Op. cit., Jacques Derrida:
Grammatology, pp. 81-88, germ. ed. ).
And
all of this almost in the form of “simultaneity” (!), which can almost be
grasped locally - that is, in the form of maximum attention to the text
currently(!) being read and in question.
After
all, in a fairly and appropriate actuality and freshness of the respective
now-time and as now-me (!), - that is, a bold and courageous kind of acute (!)
in the time of a now and now and now as well as in the formatting of a space of
the desired, ( perhaps “dreamed”! ), and as realistically at first unthought-of
presence of I and me.
“face à face” )))
MUNDUS CORPUS
“The Sense
of the World” (Jean-Luc Nancy)
“Responsibility
of the Sense” ( in: J.-L. Nancy, Das nackte Denken, Zurich, Berlin 2014, pp.
201-213 )
“Corpus” (
cf.!, read!,- absolutely !: J. - L. Nancy ! )
“This
thinking is maddening. ... the repulsion of the world is the world. Such is the
world of bodies. It has in itself this disarticulation, this inarticulation of
the corpus.” (Corpus, p. 94) !!! Violence and the body !!! Violence and
impossible thinking !!! Body-speaking !!! Touching !!! Madness !!! Delusion !!!
Sense !!! Paranoia ???
“The
Primacy of the Same or Narcissism” (Emmanuel Lévinas: The Trace of the Other,
p. 167, p. 217, germ. ed.). “The senseless suffering” (hes., - in: Between us.
Mch. 1995, p. 117ff., germ. ed.). “Touch anxiety” as the cause of the lack of a
consciousness of plurality and otherness (Antje Kapust: Berührung ohne
Berührung. Mch. 1999, germ. ed.).
For something to make sense, I
have to be able to acquire it. To be able to acquire it through iterability. I
need repetition (!). I have to learn to distinguish. I must be able to
recognize it. I must be able to identify it. Appropriation processes are educational
processes! Something only makes sense under this condition. I do not determine
the meaning. I only desire it. I strive for what I am able to recognize. I need
perspectives!
I need perspectives for a limited
appropriation. I must be able to appropriate meaning and thus a conscious
existence in relation to others.
In other words, based on
Heidegger's Being and Time, I must be able to live my “Being to Death”(!) as
full of meaning as possible (cf. my blog post on “Charlie Hebdo”) and
consciously and creatively.
A life full of meaningful
moments! (cf.: John Dewey, Experience and Nature)
Deconstruction
is permanently engaged in the struggle to limit violence, a violence that is
inseparable from the discourse of human rights.
( see “Teaser” on the question of deconstruction, on the question: What is deconstruction?
What “is” deconstruction. On the question: What is “here” deconstruction ?, -
and how does deconstruction happen, how does deconstruction occur, what does
the deconstructing practice do, compare blog post: “POÉSIE ENGAGÉE Sprachruf
Rufsprache https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2015/02/poesie-engagee-sprachruf-rufsprache.html?m=1
Ingenuity Invention” )
Deconstruction and/or invention
and/or intervention.
Dekonstruktion und/als Invention und/als Intervention.
My mourning is for the
survivors as the creators of sense and for all victims of the confused.
ΜΗΔΕΙΣ AΨYXOΛOΓIKOΣ EIΣITΩ
Medeis apsychologikos eisito
Let no one unversed in
„psychoanalysis“ enter here
ΜΗΔΕΙΣ ΑΓΡΑΜΜATIKÓΣ EIΣITΩ
Medeis agrammatikos eisito
Let no one unversed in
„grammatology“
enter here
ΜΗΔΕΙΣ AΦPENÓ-ΠΛHKTOΣ EIΣITΩ
Medeis aphrenoplektos eisito
Niemand ( m / f / o ), der
nicht "leidenschaftlich" ist, sollte Eintritt
suchen !
No
"passion"
( cf. Nietzsche ! Rousseau, Freud, Artaud, Derrida ! ) no entree !
(( Cf. Teaser !!! ))
ΜΗΔΕΙΣ AΨYXOΛOΓIKOΣ EIΣITΩ
Medeis
apsychologikos eisito
Let no
one unversed in „psychoanalysis“ enter here
ΜΗΔΕΙΣ ΑΓΡΑΜΜATIKÓΣ EIΣITΩ
Medeis agrammatikos
eisito
Let no
one unversed in „grammatology“ enter here
P A S S I
O N / passion / passages / phrenoplekt / patheticus / passionate / emotional
contactions / empathy / trust / pathos / emotion / movement /
motion / touching, Jacques Derrida ( "So this text has
several ages. From one sentence to another it sometimes jumps for years. I
could have played a game with the reader and marked the layers of an archive in colour."
cf. quotation from "Preface" in: Jacques Derrida: Touching/Berühren,
Jean-Luc Nancy p. 6 )
:
:
I play this game as desire and necessity and as desire need:
I
ONE
PERHAPS ! ALSO ! Almost ! GREAT ! LAUGHABLE ! "GESTURE" !! ONE about
TIME OF YEAR ! AND PASSIONATE !! READERS
A reader
who has been faithful and passionate for decades!
see/look/reflect
teasers (of the blog) and its color mark(s) color mark(s)
color
mark(s) color mark(s)color mark(s) color
mark(s) color mark(s) color mark(s) color mark(s) color mark(s) color mark(s)
color mark(s) color mark(s) color mark(s)!
(( small
instruction / Hint(!):
The "Book of Kells", Wittenwilers "Ring" about, fine arts,
"holy"(!) writings, medieval rare splendor copies of
"Book"(!), compositions, language(s) / metaphors like
sun>light>illumination>enlightenment etc.., Architecture (facades and
plans), Geographical maps, globes, corrected school notebooks, shopping lists,
stage directions, margin notes, secret files, confidential files, blackened
files(!), >>> Arno Schmidt "Zettels Traum"(!),
Lawrence Sterne "Tristram Shandy"(!), "Rom
Blicke"(R. D. Brinkmann), Gerhard Anna Concic-Kaucic "/S/E/M/EI/ON/
/A/OR/IST/I/CON/"(!!!) etc. et cetera !
All these and even more are objects, realities with reference surplus, significant and semantic
surpluses/added values/added value. Additional markings as second and third level of contexts and denotation
potentials. Color marking! Color markings!
Double and doubling reading!
Cf. the side lines at the beginning of Heinrich Wittenwilers
"Ring". The reading including the
color lines as interpretations of the second level enables whole text logic
cancellations across and contrary to the first simple recording of meaning and
sense of the first reading!!!
There is no literal sense/(meaning!)
- those who think this succumb to the power of habit and thus to their own
reading laziness.
Everything that appeals to you(!) should be read at
least seven times !!!
Please always pay attention to the colour
markings! Especially the markings in the teaser! An additional interpretation level, deconstruction
level
and reading link! ))
:
:
"Le
sens du monde" (J.-L. Nancy)
The meaning of the world
The senses of the world
Sense Interlacements Incommunicability
Philosophical practice the enigmatic and disturbing
necessity
Of communication
Grammatological Philosophical Practice the Enigmatic Necessity
of communication
!!! cf.
first and foremost to the word "communication" and to the meaning and
situation in the semantic field of communication Jacques Derrida's
"signature event context" , - in: Randgänge der Philosophie. Vienna
1988, p. 291ff. (german edition) !!!
Small Inductio to the
Dissertation/Doctoral
thesis Gerhard Kaučić Paris Lodron University of Salzburg 1986
Gerhard
Kaučić: Grammatotechnè as grammatology of the “Herzgewächse” or of
incommunicability. Dissertation Salzburg 1986.
https://permalink.obvsg.at/AC02072855
On Jacques Derrida's deconstruction and
Hans Wollschläger's “Herzgewächse” (novel), deconstruction of the problematic
nature of communication including “illegibility” / “illisibility” (R Barthes,
Hamacher, Paul de Man) ... 1986
cf.:
Url, pdf, Phil. Diss. Gerhard Kaučić, Salzburg 1986
https://kaucic-huber.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Diss.1986_G.Kaucic_Grammatotechne_als_Gr.pdf
Url pdf
Diss. G. Kaucic 1986 on “Internet Archive Wayback Machine”:
The trace of something must be thought before the existing! (Derrida)
Heraclitus
already calls the awake thinkers those who do not “think things as they
encounter them”.
” the secret of the
communicative in the constantly
threatening incommunicability”
Performativity
/ Performativity ! ( J. Derrida, “Signature, Event, Context” / J. Butler,
“Excitable Speech. A Politics of the Performative” / E. Fischer-Lichte,
‘Aesthetics of the Performative’)
Escaping
the “ commented ‘ of the ’commentary”!
( cf.: § Para-Graphie : K o m m e n t a r , - in: Gerhard
Kaučić: Grammatotechnè als Grammatologie der “HERZGEWÄCHSE” oder von der
Inkommunikabilität. Salzburg
1986, pp. 46-71., german ed. )
Parekbase,
Parabase (Schlegel, Barthes, Derrida, Cončić-Kaučić) !
Escape the
reduction, the falsification, the humiliation, the castration of the “text” by
the “commentary”!
The
“commentary” always restricts the “text”!
Performanz
/ Performance !
Text
politics !
Text
performance / repetition / iterability / marking !
Dissemination / Idiom ! Performativity !
( cf.: § Para-Graphie : D i s s e m i n a t i o n, - in:
Gerhard Kaučić: Grammatotechnè als Grammatologie der “HERZGEWÄCHSE” oder von
der Inkommunikabilität. Salzburg
1986, pp. 71-74., german ed. )
Text music
/ text image / coloratura / voice / texture !
Text
configuration
What is
information? What is a sentence? What is a question? What determines a
question?
Philosophical
practice as overcoming fear! The eternal conflict with authority as a
permanently deconstructive attempt at communication - the secret of the
communicative in the constantly threatening incommunicability. Our task
is to thwart the discourses of power, of domination, of authority - and every
discourse implies the exercise of power! - by analyzing and deconstructing the
ideologems and their codes.
Every
sentence has too little time. Every sentence displaces by jumping. It displaces
many other possible and necessary (!) sentences (for more see my/our YouTube
video on “The sentence”).
Every
sentence, every word, every code drives its being and its mischief in
incommunicability!
Every
sentence greets a ghost. Every sentence is a ghost.
Every
sentence in every setting and every session (including those in a
PP/philosophical practice).
I should/we
should always have the opportunity to explain all the psychoanalytic, economic,
political and juridical implications of the above.
I refer all
readers to my/our publications on the net and to the publications on paper.
The terrain
of reading is abysmal(!) and unlimited!
Philosophical
practice
the
enigmatic and disturbing necessity
of
communication
undecidability
? Incommunicability ?
Emergence
of the self! Markings!
S e l f s t
- R e f l e c t i v i t y
Reflectivity
Self-reflectivity
Gerhard Kaučić, “§ ParaGraphie : D i f f e r ä n z”, - in:
G. K.: Grammatotechne als Grammatologie der HERZGEWÄCHSE oder von der
Inkommunikabilität. Salzburg 1986, pp. 74-84. (germ. ed.)
and esp:
J. Derrida, La différance, - in: “Randgänge der
Philosophie”. Vienna 1988 (Passagen Verlag), pp. 29-52. (germ. ed.)
What and how
would be an appropriate thinking practice today
In what
>is<(!) philosophy conceivable today and through what or from where is
that which we mean differently by philosophy to be practiced.
The term(!)
différance questions the human being in a certain sense and thereby
draws the history of life in general.
Once again
to humanism as logocentrism or phonologocentrism.
Derrida
shows that the traditionally hierarchical arrangement of the two components of
language must be deconstructed. Right up to modern linguistics, the ideal
meaning of a sign, called s i g n i f i c a t (the conception), is placed above
the material carrier of the meaning, called s i g n i f i c a n t (the sound or
written image). An attempt is always made to align the external signifier, the
writing, with a transcendental signified.
Think of what we said earlier about religion, God and man.
See also:
http://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.co.at/2017/04/religion-und-gesellschaft-teil-2.html
However,
every signified (the idea!) is (according to Derrida) “always already in the
position of the signifier” (Derrida, Grammatology, p. 129, germ. ed.).
There can
be no meaning and no sense that could escape the spatialization and
temporalization as well as the differential play of signifier relations.
According
to this definition, writing is a sign of signs, a signifier of signifiers.
This
reversal is primarily intended to show that the materiality of the signifier is
not added to the meaning a posteriori and externally, but vice versa, that the
sense is the e f f e c t of a signification that has always already been
implicit. In this way, Derrida reformulated and reconceptualized the
relationship between language and writing.
Through
Derrida's transformation of the concept of writing, it goes beyond that of
language and includes it.
All of this
results in a completely new understanding and event of text, because it has
been transformed several times.
The
“essence”, the practice of deconstruction, is inherent to such a text
(understanding), i.e. “written into” it (cf. Derrida, Freud and the Scene of
Writing or Freud's “Wunderblock”).
The
thinking of difference/différance is the inherent practice of “deconstruction”.
This is
what my dissertation is about as a philosophical practice
(( and this
includes the conversation, but also my/our writing practice before and after
each setting/session(!) ))
always
about grasping texts (written, spoken or representations(!), e.g. of a
technical, artistic, economic, political, institutional nature) in their inner
structure and in their interaction with other texts.
The texts
are not only to be analyzed and interpreted, but their conflictuality, their
aggressiveness, their concealed content and intentions are to be unmasked
through the practice of deconstruction.
What is
meant is the visualization of the duality of the simultaneous presence and
absence(!) of truth.
We express
propositions of intentional analytical truth and thereby simultaneously
suppress other possible propositions of truth or untruth.
Jacques
Derrida describes the process of life with the invention of his D i f f é r
a n c e
(( cf. teaser and footer in our blog ( Philosophical Practices / Politics / Disseminations Philosophical Practice G Kaučić & AL Huber
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2016/03/was-ist-philosophische-praxis-iii-teil-3.html?m=1 ), German and English, only visible in the Web Version )),in which
man is a special case, a unique case. Almost a coincidence, and yet from a
certain distance covered by processes of a physical, chemical and then
neurological nature, increasingly stringent, defined, fixed.
Where is the transition from animal to human?
That is
exciting and thrilling. Is there even such a thing as drawing a line?
I ask this
question without any intention of turning humans into animals.
We are
animalistic, but not beastly alone. And what does animal mean here! ( in this
blog, - see my blog posting “Animal Philosophy” !!! )
Animals
are! Are many different individuals! And each animal is unique !!!
And some
animals even have so-called human characteristics such as memory, technical
ability, special skills, reasoning ability, love, communication, etc.! And
sometimes even consciousness!
Jacques Derrida's
phonologocentrism means, among other things, that all humanism is
logocentric and all metaphysics is humanism.
Even if
most philosophers to this day do not like to hear this.
Humanism
as metaphysics is the enemy of animals.
The
enemy of animals and ultimately also the enemy of humans.
I can't
roll up everything here(!) now (we always do that!), take a look at my/our
animal philosophy in the blog, - read Derrida's work on it and pay attention to
the “sins”(!) - catalog, - my/our red list on the “coming democracy”!
(keyword “species extinction”, “climate change”, ... etc.; always to be found
in the appendix of each posting in red font, English and German).
If
grammatology “cannot be a science of man” it is precisely because “from the outset it
poses the fundamental question of the name of man” (J. Derrida, Grammatology,
1974, p. 148, germ. ed.).
This
dissertation and our subsequent work, accompanied by publications on paper and
online, are all about this: Gerhard Kaučić (Dr. phil.), Anna Lydia Huber (MSc),
Jg. '59 Gespräch, Diskurs, Dekonstruktion
Philosophical
practice Vienna 1989 ff. Analysis Complication Aporia Identity Dislocation
Meta-thesis Deconstruction
Cf. list of
publications at: https://scholar.google.at/citations?user=wNUSN64AAAAJ&hl=de
Kant
regards freedom as incomprehensible and man, especially “free man”, as falling
under non-determinability. They are mutually exclusive!
The meaning of every freedom would be to love and
not to hate.
To love in indeterminacy.
The aporia of the concept of freedom lies in
itself. Freedom without something, without direction, - freedom from democracy,
- being free from the democratic?
Subject, direction / meaning/sense, freedom. The
subject needs freedom in order to become a subject, to remain a subject.
Freedom needs democracy. Democracy needs political subjects.
The subject hates when deprived (of love).
The hatred
of democracy!
The
subject of freedom is not a general one, it is singular when it works on its
freedom and only produces the subject itself (again and again).
The
subject and its singularity. The subject of hate and hatred and the subject of
loving and love in its singularity in the democracy of freedom.
Democracy
needs freedom. Freedom needs democracy. Subject needs freedom. Freedom needs
subject(s).
(cf. our post from January 2025: The concept of freedom. A crisis of freedom.
The concept of freedom and its freedoms. On the concept and comprehensibility
of freedom https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/01/the-concept-of-freedom-crisis-of-freedom.html?m=1 )
There is
always no time. Democracy does not have time, has too little time.
The
aporia of hatred through lack of time, time deprivation, loss of time.
The long
while of lack of time.
It takes
time to work on hatred. Hate needs time. Love needs time. Love needs subject,
freedom, meaning/direction. Love needs democracy. Democracy of freedom.
We live
in democratic states (still?, always?!), - is a frequently uttered sentence.
Not in
lawless states, rogue states or religiously bound states.
Why the
hatred of democracy?
The
aporia! The subject!
Let us
remember Otto Kernberg's definition of hatred.
According
to this, hatred implies the consolidation of an internalized object relation
between a suffering self and an object that seems to deliberately induce the
suffering of the self !!!!
The
aporia of hatred! The aporia of the subject of freedom and democracy (like
non-democracy!).
Democracy
is under threat. From many sides. In many cases it does not (yet) exist -
democracy! Not even here in Central Europe.
Interest
groups, social partners, sovereigns, financial oligarchs, extremely
narcissistic presidents with too many constitutional rights and a lack of
political sense, populist to fascist party tendencies, major powers, corporate
interests, right-wing intellectuals, religious underground currents, etc., they
all threaten democracy, right up to international terrorism - they all
negotiate and gamble away “the democratic”.
They all
hate democracy.
All of
them, the haters, through their hatred of democracy, perhaps bring about one
thing - to rediscover democracy, to rethink it, to reinvent it or to recognize
what that means, “democracy” and the coming democracy!
Democracy
is not a form of government that enables the big players, the rich, the
oligarchs to rule, yes, to rule in the name of the people.
And
democracy is not a form of society for managing or regulating the flow of
goods.
Democracy
is a practice, based on human
dignity as the
highest principle of human rights (and the underlying theories of good and justice from Plato to Rawls and
others, - see my teaser/visible only in the web version!), which can, should
and must make it possible to make it impossible for the oligarchy to rule in
the name of a people through confusion of concepts, deceptive maneuvers and all
kinds of rigged cards (corruption, corruptibility, etc.) in the political game
of political personnel.
Democracy
is the practice of obtaining the rules that can prevent governments and wealth
accumulators from exercising omnipotence over public and publicized life and
over the life of all (and its conditions).
It is
always and continually necessary to think, discover, recognize and strive to
realize the specificity of democracy (in the making).
Democracy,
the idea of democracy, is fragile and powerful at the same time.
It
haunts us as a ghost, it is not a necessary historical consequence of anything
in history and no institution (as that of the mind and the rationality of
reason in interaction with the bodies of pleasure and the bodies of pain) can
sustain its guarantee in the long term.
Democracy
follows its actions in the sense of global justice for all.
Being
(able to be) good naturally includes the moderation of all with regard to the
finiteness of our planet Earth and, before that, especially moderation in the
permitted(!?) access to the other(s). Love is an >access<! Hate is an
“access”!
Hatred,
and especially the hatred of democracy, belongs to the intemperate, the greedy,
the accumulators and their personnel of intellectual seduction in the political
field (of whatever provenance and ideology).
The
>good intelligence< (!) is certainly not to be found among the haters,
the abusers, the oppressors and threateners.
Share
the love and joy of life!
Engage
in a truly effective politics of friendship!
And
recognize the fundamental inconclusiveness of the social and the political!
From
this follows the realization that the condition of the possibility of something
simultaneously includes its condition of impossibility.
The deconstruction of the political and the fields of politics thus expands the field for decisions that
must be made in a field of undecidability.
Inscription and re-inscription are possible and necessary. The social and the
political - they are fundamentally(!) open and cannot be totalized.
Hatred
has no place (anymore). At least not an all-encompassing one. Only (!)
devastated subjects in motion. Ugly aporia! Pragma. Pragmatiké Téchné !
Free
existence “living and thinking” as >determination<!
To live
and think the value of life in freedom.
In the face of the (ever) other!
Language is “power to act”. The action of language is powerful! This very setting and this
figuration/configuration (cf. my teaser on this) is also “agency” and explains
linguistic agency in a nutshell (cf. teaser and my video on the “sentence”!).
Language
as a figure for agency and agency as a figure of language. The agency of
language is not the same as that of the subject, who can do things with
language, but also in language (cf. teaser on “deconstruction” and différance /
Derrida!).
Language
is based on a divided, I would like to say doubled nature, an operativum
divided in itself. Language is, or rather the instrument of statements shares
something “essential” with language because, precisely because no statement can
be reduced to its instrument (if you want to delve deeper into this
>matter< of “language”, read “Limited Inc” by Derrida together with the
texts of the speech act theorists Austin and Searle and others).
When we
use language, we inevitably evoke effects in ourselves and in others. We
transform ourselves, but also the other and we transform the other, the
language. Language is a name for what we do - the action we are doing - and a
name for what we cause - the action and its consequences.
Words,
chosen wording, sentences hurt!
The
subjects, the medium, the language, the statement, the way of saying, what is
said, the touched(!) contexts, the readers, the citizens, the laws, the state,
the community, the social contract!
All this
is attacked, injured, damaged, - perhaps destroyed!
Hate
speech can lead to the death of the subject if this “speech” gets into the
position of domination or can invoke such a position, - then this speech act(!)
becomes a form of articulation of the ruling power and thus a kind of
reproduction of power ( cf. for
example Chile under Pinochet or Germany and Austria under Hitler or today
Russia under Putin; as we know, there would be many more examples ).
Repetitions
of sentences as hate speech and their publication can ( but do not have to!
Bridge of speech, subversion is always possible, always possible in speech! - cf. Althusser, Foucault, Deleuze, especially Derrida ) and will shape the subjects, those who utter and those who are called
upon.
Offensive
formulations call out, they call for the localization of discursive and
physical violence, they precede every utterance that sets them in scene,
attempt and, as it were, bring them about. The utterance is available to the
subject, the subject is formed and the subject continues the discourse as a
subjugating one.
According
to Freud, a forbidden desire in the unconscious shifts from one thing to the
next. This infinite transmissibility of desire, which is seduced by a
prohibition, a blockade, a taboo, controls this logic of infection quasi
uncontrollably in a so-called metonymic flow (think of your own “desire” to do
forbidden things - e.g. when familiar circumstances change!)
In
Freud's “The Unease in Culture”, the location of the libido is shifted
and itself becomes the pleasure location of the prohibition. Here, repression
takes on the form in which it itself becomes a libidinal activity.
This
applies to the banal hate poster as well as to the recreational hooligan
working as a lawyer in civilian life as well as to the sadistically obsessed
murderer / lust murderer / serial killer / mass murderer or the theologically
processed youth (among others) for murder attacks (as in the Bataclan
etc., cf. my posts “Charly Hebdo” and “Attentat” in this blog).
The
power of a performative utterance can be enormous - in both directions!
Denunciation
and self-denunciation!
Depending
on how it is read and depending on the readership and the reader's position
(political, ideological, intellectual).
The
break with the context (Derrida) of a performative utterance is always inherent
to it, the failure of every utterance is marked by the thing “language”. But
many actors do not realize this! Actors of hate speech apparently almost never
notice the self-denunciation, or notice it too late.
The
history of subjugation is (also) a history of language and speech.
Consequently,
human education is the first concern of any democratic society.
Our life
is a life of differences. Difference enables perception and vitality.
Difference
and differences are nothing simple (!)
You have
to make an effort!
Differentiation
is an effort and a pleasure. Every culture lives from difference! And every
person in and with his thinking.
Enabling
difference is also the possibility of difference to oneself and this opens up life on many levels. With humor and intelligence.
Without humor and laughter, there can be no life of joy and vitality.
Every
culture needs subjectivity, subversiveness, criticism and a large portion of
commonality (also in difference).
To speak
briefly with Derrida, to remind us how necessary this will always be: The subject of an utterance can hardly be
aware, and must be aware, that all “communication” is subject to a general
graphematic structure.
One
consequence of this is that the iteration structure is given and thus the intention of an utterance can never be fully
present to itself and its content. This means that the iteration always
produces a break, the iteration structures a p r i
o r i.
There is
always already an oratio obliqua, a structural unconsciousness of intention in
the actuality of the statement. Never forget to remember that in the thing and
in the conception of it a ghost is at work - the teleological illusion of
consciousness (cf. in
particular “Signature, Event, Context” by J. Derrida, in: Margins of Philosophy,
fr. Marges de la philosophie, germ.
Randgänge der Philosophie).
Every
hurtful (sexist/racist/fascist) statement, every racist act of speech hurts a
person (also physically!) as a result of a contextual shift to which it is not
possible to react adequately or respond adequately (more details on the
difference between reacting and responding later).
The
unpredictability of another's orientation, the loss of trust, the loss of
naivety/naturalness/appropriateness in the action/reaction to each other is
severely disturbed. One is disturbed!
No
context for an appropriate reaction! No orientation! Frustration! Fear!
Feelings of loss and lack!
The domination of the Other as a consequence of the lack of doubt.
The
Political Body and the Other
Affections
Inscriptions
Recollections
to contact me, please use only this email:
g.kaucic[at]chello.at
LOST AND
CONFUSED. SEXISTS. AN ATTEMPT AT COMMUNICATION.
Sexual
economies!!! Sexists!? Sexism!?
Sexism debates!
Desire
and responsibility!
Sexual
economies! The possibilities of being born to the end!!!
the secret of the
communicative in the constantly
threatening
incommunicability
Sexism.
Sexism debates. Treatments.
Philosophical
practices.
Slow,
concentrated reading.
Analysis.
Reflectorium.
Possibilities
for identity dislocation. Deconstruction.
Becoming
a subject. To be born to the end. Repeated !
Sexism
debates! Sexism! And! sexual economies!
Desire
and responsibility!
the secret of the communicative in the constantly
threatening incommunicability
Lost and
confused gropers, touchers, harassers, sexists, (sexually) violent and
humiliating
abusers
and humiliators, racists, assassins, torturers, fascists, murderers
of all
countries, go into meditation, reflection and analysis!!!
Sexual
economies!
Desire and responsibility !!!
Possible
career of carelessness(!?), rudeness, being rejected(!),
feelings
of hatred, exclusion, sexism, sexual harassment, coercion, the crude,
racism,
hate speech, violence, rape, cruelty, torture, fascism, inclusion, mobbing up
to murder (?!!!), serial murder, mass murder, genocide, extermination!!!
Becoming a subject. To be born to the end.
Repeatedly !
Possibilities
for identity
dislocation. Deconstruction.
Gewalt
Politik Subjekt
Politik Verwirrung Gewalt Physische Attacken
Attentate
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/02/gewalt-politik-subjekt.html
Gewalt Politik Subjekt
Politik Verwirrung Gewalt Physische Attacken
Attentate
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/02/gewalt-politik-subjekt.html?m=1
Violence Politics Subject
Politics Confusion Violence Physical attacks Assassinations
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/02/violence-politics-subject.html
Violence Politics Subject
Politics Confusion Violence Physical attacks Assassinations
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/02/violence-politics-subject.html?m=1
And: As always, we have too little time!
Every sentence has too little time. Every sentence displaces by jumping. It displaces many other possible and necessary (!) sentences (for more, see my YouTube video on “The sentence”).
Every sentence, every word, every code drives its essence and its mischief in incommunicability!
Every sentence greets a ghost. Every sentence is a ghost.
Every sentence in every setting and every session (including those in a PP/philosophical practice).
I should always have the opportunity to explain all the psychoanalytic, economic, political and juridical implications of the above.
I refer all readers to my/our publications on the net and to the publications on paper.
The terrain of reading is abysmal(!) and unlimited!
P.s.:
[ The original text in German can be found after the end of the English translation ]
Best regards!
Gerhard Kaučić & Anna Lydia Huber
PP Vienna
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
Post scriptum:
The tasks of a future democracy/a democracy on the rise/a permanent advent/arrival of democracy/a democracy in the arrival ( Jacques Derrida ), to think the subject as „planetary“ (cf. G. Ch. Spivak, see teaser, - the teaser from my blog; note: the teaser is only visible in the web-version!), - especially concerning the great challenges of politics in the 21st century: Utopia (?!) of reflexive solidarity (Spivak),
borders of a planet (John Bellamy Foster et al. (Ed.): The Ecological Rift: Capitalism’s War on the Earth, 2011), deconstructive politics as an ideological-critical reading of the imperial archive, geopolitics, geopolitical involvement, geopolitical interest driven policy and/as value policy, power, morals and human rights, analysis of power, gender and governmentality, teletechnology, political bodies, complexities of rule, citizenship, parliamentarianism, peace policy, institution building and institution maintenance, economically correct and fair redistribution of social wealth, proper management of Migration (Flüchtlinge, Refugees), …
proper handling of migration (refugees), migration and capitalism, Postkolonialismus, neocolonialism, postcolonialism, Kolonialisierung auf allen Ebenen, Kolonialismus, Rassismus, Faschismus, Neo - Kolonialismus, Ökonomismus, Imperialismus,
Ökonomischer Imperialismus (angeleitet durch die Neue Institutionenökonomik, die Transaktionskostenökonomik und die Prinzipal-Agent-Theorie; im Gefolge des New Public Management treten an die Stelle von Handeln nach Maßgabe professioneller Ethiken Kontraktmanagement mit Zielvereinbarungen und anstelle einer Berufsethik Qualitätsmanagement und Benchmarking samt Controlling und Leistungsrechnung mit all ihren Schattenseiten und ungeplanten Nebenwirkungen, - vgl. Richard Münch: Globale Eliten, lokale Autoritäten, Frf. 2009, Suhrkamp, S. 18 vv.ff.),
Economic imperialism (guided by new institutional economics, transaction cost economics and principal-agent theory; in the wake of New Public Management, contract management with target agreements takes the place of acting in accordance with professional ethics, and quality management and benchmarking, including controlling and performance accounting with all their dark sides and unplanned side effects, - see Richard Münch: Globale Eliten, lokale Autoritäten, Frf. 2009, Suhrkamp, p. 18 vv.ff., germ. ed.)
the world as environment and its destruction, manmade environmental disasters, shipping, esp. container shipping, pollution of oceans, pollution of soil, greenhouse gases, temperature rise, shortage of resources, prosperity gap,
population density, urban development ( e.g. "Gängeviertel" in Hamburg, the initiative "Komm in die Gänge" stands for discourse and practice of a different (!) form of urban development and is an example and symbol that gives hope against gentrification and the destruction of old buildings ),
urban development towards a green city, urban philosophy, reddening of the city, city of dreams, madness and society, madness and city, city and sexuality, desire and city, city as text, city and writing, city as writing, the city and the divided I, the city and the power, the city and the political, the city as a mechanism of discipline, the city as a social testing lab, the city and the philosophical practice with many practices, the world as a city and the other, water wars, religious wars, climate change, climate consequences, global warming, nuclear relicts, climate wars, climate catastrophes, civil wars, „ethnic cleansing“ (!), genocide, violent conflicts, social questions, ecological questions, planetary principle, tradition history, the question of a global government (!?), social catastrophes, terrorism, natural disasters, migration, unstable states, poverty, wealth, corruption, media policy and presence-ideologies, war and non-war, world order and biopolicy, weapon development, arms delivery, violent and oppressive power politics, religious fanaticism, party political fanaticism, terrorism, biodiversity, standardization, factory farming, animal factories, animal consumption, „meat production“!, animal rights, animal philosophy,
„animal turn“ (vgl. Anne Peters, Tier-Recht im Zeitalter des Menschen, - in: Renn/Scherer (Hg.), Das Anthropozän. Zum Stand der Dinge. Berlin 2015, S. 67ff.),
ethical norms, euthanasia, terminal care, aging, health and sports, sports and age, ethics and medicine, cyber war, cyber crime, technology and space, political demarcation, deterritorialization, tourism, mass media, mass mediality, neoliberalization of the subjects, power,
truth and passion (vgl.: Gabriele Michalitsch: Die neoliberale Domestizierung des Subjekts. Von den Leidenschaften zum Kalkül. Campus Verlag, Frankf. a. M. 2006, bes. S. 29ff. und S. 101ff.),
sex labour, difference and the shaping of the social ( Antke Engel: Bilder von Sexualität und Ökonomie. Queere kulturelle Politiken im Neoliberalismus. Bielefeld 2009, S. 138ff. ),
automobility, digitalia and upbringing, education, unemployment, debt crisis, failing of democratization, neglect of the common good,
production and consumption (David Harvey), globalized consumption, market fanaticism, power of the market, democratization of the market, power of the globally operating financial markets, education, social policy, urban policy, policy of affordable housing, youth unemployment, social inequality, exclusion, individuality, sovereignty, liberalism, egalitarianism, limits of growth, mobility, traffic and communication, ecology, freedom, justice, interests of corporate groups, turbo-capitalism, global tax culture, international tax evasion, tax fraud, Drogierungsverhalten, drug laws, drug culture,
the own and the foreign, fascism, antisemitism, racism, sexism, human trafficking,
modern slavery (cf.: Kevin Bales, dt. Üs: "Die neue Sklaverei", engl. V.: K. B., "Disposable People. New Slavery in the Global Economy" und Hanns Wienold ),
"Neger, Rasse, Rassen-Subjekt, Rassismus, Schwarze Vernunft, Versklavung, Sklaverei, Massenversklavung in der Geschichte gestern heute morgen, das Rassensubjekt/Negro, race, racial subject, racism, black reason, enslavement, slavery, mass slavery in history, yesterday - today - tomorrow, the racial subject"
((cf.: Achille Mbembe: Critique de la raison nègre. Paris 2013 ( Orig. fr. ). Achille Mbembe: Critique of Black Reason. Duke University Press Books 2017 (transl., Laurent Dubois). Achille Mbembe: Kritik der schwarzen Vernunft. Berlin, Suhrkamp, 2014 (ÜS aus d. Franz., Michael Bischoff). )),
arms trade, private purchase of weapons, possession of weapons, increase in complexity, knowledge generation, urbanization and population growth, democracy deficit, sustainability crisis, green energy, energy regime, energy crisis, legitimization crisis, territoriality, agricultural policy, fishing policy, famine (cf. Jean Ziegler),
famine and capitalism, „the right to food“
(( human right, UN-social covenant, Article 11 (1) and (2); human dignity ( primary normative principle of human rights, ethical principle, "dignitas" (Cicero), the "idea of the good" (Plato), fundamental „equal worth of all human beings“ (Kant), protection of the human dignity in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union )),
need of land, land grabbing, land robbery, justice, human rights, decolonization of thinking, policy of displacement, solidarity across class, race, and national boundaries (Mohanty, passim),
just policy as a policy of strengthening the weak
(( zum planetarischen Subjekt cf. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak: Imperative zur Neuerfindung des Planeten - Imperatives to Re-Imagine the Planet (hg. v. Willi Goetschel engl./dt.). Wien 2013, 2. Aufl., Passagen Verlag, S. 49vv.ff.
and Charles Taylor: Multiculturalism and the „Politics of Recognition“. Princeton 1994, p. 28 ))
Philosophischer Salon Gerhard Kaučić Djay PhilPrax & Anna Lydia Huber Gasometer Wien
Philosophical Lounge / Philosophischer Salon G Kaucic & AL Huber Vienna, Austria, - Gerhard Kaučić (*1959), head of a philosophical practice for 36 years in Vienna ( 1989-2025 ff.)
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
Philosophische Praxis
GESPRÄCHE sind EREIGNISSE als TEXT
cf. Jacques Derrida, Signatur Ereignis Kontext, - in: Randgänge der Philosophie, Wien 1988, S. 291-314 ( Französische Originalausgabe: Marges de la philosophie, Paris 1972 )
Translation into English, Gerhard Kaučić (Dr. phil., b. 1959), European Philosopher, Writer, Feminist, Translator, Freerider , Europäischer Philosoph, Philosophische Praxis/Praktische Philosophie, Sprachanalytische Philosophie, Dekonstruktion, PP Wien, Österreich, Europa
Gerhard Kaučić, Alter 66, 2025, Anna Lydia Huber, age 66, 2025
Philosoph:in des Denkens der "différance" (cf. J. Derrida, La dissémination. Collection „Tel Quel“ aux Éditions du Seuil, Paris 1972)
To contact us please use only this email: g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at
Öffnungszeiten / Hours of opening: Mo – Fr: 11 - 20 Uhr
Honorar nach Vereinbarung / Charge by arrangement
Gespräche outdoor/indoor: Grammatologien, Kontextualisierungen, Analysen, Komplizierungen, Plurivalenzen, Dependenzen, Interdependenzen, Grammatiken, Aporien, Dekonstruktion...rund um die Uhr...rund um die Welt...
...around the clock ...around the world...
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
Gegenwartsphilosophie
Contemporary Philosophy
Gerhard Kaučić & Anna Lydia Huber ( geb. 1959 ) Philosophische Praxis 1989 ff.
Anna Lydia Huber
Philosophin, Feministin, Mediatorin, Autorin, Freerider:in, geboren 1959, MSc, Alter 66, 2025
( Mitarbeiterin in der grammatologisch-philosophischen Praxis seit 2009 in Wien und darüber hinaus )
( Associate in the grammatological-philosophical practice since 2009 in Vienna and beyond )
Gerhard Kaučić
Philosoph, Feminist, Mediator, Autor, Freerider, geboren 1959, Dr. phil., Alter 66, 2025
( Leiter (seit 1989) der Philosophischen Praxis Gerhard Kaučić (Dr. phil.) & Anna Lydia Huber (MSc) )
( Head (since 1989) of the Philosophical Practice Gerhard Kaučić (Dr. phil.) & Anna Lydia Huber (MSc) )
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
Narratives, Reports, Analyses, Reflections from the Practice/from my/our Philosophical Practice
Vienna 36 years of practice jubilee (1989-2025 ff.) jubilee 36 years PP 2025
Discourses, analyses, descriptions, critiques, explanations inevitably always fall under the category "commentary".
Comments are always something added. They try to approach a thing, an event, an institution, an action, in short, a text in any form, even if it is music. Comments try to suspend something. This always fails. Comments create a displacement, a repression as well. And with time they often cover up the thing itself.
Why?!
The "commentary" limits the open semantic game with the means of identity, repetition and the temptation to represent the same. In this way it makes itself a mechanism of control and order by restricting and delimiting discourse and trying to establish unambiguity.
A translation is never a replacement ! Every setting is already a translation of the thought and the unthought. A translation changes the place, shifts and changes and is thus always a different text.
Only an approximate signified can be saved over(!) this way.
Every reading ( even "conversations" must be read! ) must first produce a significant structure.
There is no criterion for the identity of the meaning of an expression: the interpretation becomes in the scientific sense a matter of undecidability, which does not mean that one could and should not temporarily quasi-fix and evaluate it in a passagere consent of many readers.
So-called "islands of understanding" of temporary text configurations!
Understanding also in the sense of: a small or larger group of discourse participants "stands"(!) temporarily on temporarily secured "understanding" - or understanding - ground!
This reason for understanding, this "territory" of limited (temporally and spatially) understanding, the image of temporary text configurations, the image of standing behind the mirror as "standing" in the mirror, - a mirror of distortions and performances, a mirror of originally unoriginal transformations, - a mirror that gives off the image (! ) for our language, - our language as graphically marked poetics of communication, - literally ! (See J. Derrida, La dissémination, p. 350 and passim)
The commentary sets the author as the supreme principle of the order of discourse (vg. M. Foucault, Ordnung des Diskurses) and generates its authorities.
"We"(!) represent the task of disseminal critical communication as an open text of a writing, escaping exegesis and the re-presentation of the commentary.
The task is also to be expressed in such a way that "the speech is first as good and then better understood as its author" (Schleiermacher, Hermeneutik und Kritik, p. 94).
For us, the only critique to be accepted is the permanently critical critique, i.e. a permanently deconstructing critique whose object is the writable of the text, a permanently multiplying text.
"A signifier is, from the outset, the possibility of its own repetition, its own image or its similarity to itself. This is the condition of its ideality. What identifies it as a signifier and as such gives it its function and relates it to a signified can never be a 'unique and special reality' for the same reasons. From the moment the sign appears, that is, from ever since, there is no possibility of finding the pure 'reality', 'uniqueness', and 'specialness'.” (Derrida, Grammatology, p. 165, germ. ed.)
The authority of the Logos, the commentary, the dominion of the interpretation of scripture nailed to its origins has for some time been exposed to the critical criticism of deconstruction and thus the chance of democracy in the coming (Derrida).
All this points to a radical possibility that cannot be thought of by any single science or abstract discipline (Derrida, Grammatologie, 168f., german edition).
Intertextuality and the underlying multiplicity of codes is in principle unlimited and cannot be limited.The resulting deconstructive textualities and their connotation texture cannot be included or even determined by any context.
The “text” has ceased to be an object in itself. The permanently absent presence of
I n t e r t e x t u a l i t y (this applies to every text, and has done since time immemorial), in which the power of the break with its contexts as a sum of never fully present presences has always been structurally immanent in every sign of writing, has always determined writing - writing without origin and destination (arche, telos).
Practice of d i f f é r a n c e ! ! !
European Philosopher, Writer, Feminist, deconstructed Hegelian, Translator, Mediator, Freerider, Bicycle Traveller, Enduro Biker, Ecomobilist, Survivor, Philosophical Practitioner/Practical Philosophy, Analytical Philosophy of Language, Deconstruction, Philosophical Practice Vienna Austria Europe ))
PP.s.:
Our score for the polyphony, heterophony and unlimited polyphony of postmodernism:
One of several foundational texts: 'The Voice and the Phenomenon' (Derrida)
Author:
Gerhard Anna Cončić-Kaučić, born 1959, Schriftsteller:in/Writer, Vienna/Wien.
Performances only after express consultation with the author and publisher!
Title by Gerhard Anna Cončić-Kaučić published by Wiener Passagen Verlag:
a little teaser before you start reading/ Quote from our old homepage
https://web.archive.org/web/20190611215805/http:/web.utanet.at/gack/
https://web.archive.org/web/20171115140036/http://web.utanet.at/gack/Obrief.html
1) In German
>> Offener "Brief"
"Be-denken" Sie jedes Wort. "Schweigen Exil List" unsere Devise unsere Wahl unser Joyce jenseits von Sackgassen wie Politik Kunst Religion. Großes Lachen in der Verschiebung & Verdichtung die Mobilität der Syntax
"... einen Text als Text ablesen können, ohne eine Interpretation dazwischen zu mengen, ist die späteste Form der > inneren Erfahrung < - vielleicht eine kaum mögliche ..." ( Nietzsche, Aus dem Nachlaß der Achtzigerjahre; in: Werke III, hg. v. Karl Schlechta, Mch. 1969, S.805)
Worte an Verleger, Rezensenten und andere LiteraturvermittlerInnen
Der Gedanke an den "nahen" Tod, auch wenn er noch ein ( 1 ), zwei (2) oder mehr kurze Jahrzehnte auf sich warten lassen sollte, läßt mich/uns "Abstand" nehmen von Veranstaltungen allgemeiner Art wie Präsentationen Kongressen Symposien et cetera.
Vielleicht "sagen" Sie das den anwesend "sein" werdenden JournalistInnen. Autor sein muß nicht heißen Literaturmanagement und in unserem Fall ganz gewiß nicht.
Autor-Sein "bedeutet" so etwas wie "Gott-sein" (vgl. Thot).
Ich gebe/gibt "Text". Von Fall zu Fall diesem "Stimme"; nie aber bloß "Gesicht", pré-"face", Präsenz.
Im ff. ein paar "plakative" Hinweise.
Vielleicht wollen Sie Kopien an die anwesenden Literaturvermittler verteilen und verweisen Sie auf das "Vorwort" von Sem I.
Oder wollen Sie das vielleicht selbst verlautbaren, dort ? wenn ich in aller gebotenen Kürze Sie auf das Vorwort, die Vorrede von Sem I verweisen darf. (And to the preface by Sem V !!!)
Füttern Sie die JournalistInnen damit, lesen Sie es Ihnen sogar vor; verweisen Sie sie auf die Abschnitte der Dissemination von J. Derrida über das Vorwort und auf die einschlägigen Abschnitte in "Grammatotechne als Grammatologie der `Herzgewächse´ oder von der Inkommunikabilität"
Nehmen Sie und die JournalistInnen die Wörter ernst, dann "erkennen" sie das Programm Semeion Aoristicon I -VII (s. Vorwort). Das sollte genügen. Dann die Lektüre.
Im übrigen: die "Unauffindbarkeit des Subjekts"
Legen Sie Sem I, II, III, an unsere Stelle. Sub-Version eines sub-spekten Subiect.
Autor GACK mit freundlichen Grüßen
P.S. Vielleicht lesen Sie auch das "einfach" (vor), wahrscheinlich wenden Sie jetzt Ihr Ohr ab, trotzdem: die Vorrede das préface, das was vor dem Gesicht (=face) ist, schaun Sie lesen Sie und Sie lesen immer nur die Vorrede, das préface, das alles ist.
Das Gesicht, das Ge-sicht sehen Sie nie.
Das vollständig aufgelöste Subjekt im Spiegel: Sem I, II, III jenseits aller Literatur Sem I, II, III ff. lesen Sie das vor dem "Gesicht" der JournalistInnen im "Auftrag" des "Autor" "GACK" face á face
die Intrige der plot
Inspektor Sem und seine Fam/ilie öffnen alle Wortkoffer, sie werden verfolgt und sind selber auf der richtigen Spur;
das Verbergen Verheimlichen Maskieren, die Maske die Prosopopöie, die Ent-stellung; sämtliche Tricks eines Inspektors und ehemaligen Privatdetektivs; der Fall der Fälle gelangt zur Lösung Erlösung;
durch Sem Schaun und seine "Fa/milie"
"Plakat" zur Präsentation:
"Lesen" Sie die Zusammenhänge von Sex und Religion
"Schaun" Sie Sem I
"Lesen" Sie die Zusammenhänge von Literatur und Schrift
"Schaun" Sie Sem II
"Lesen" Sie die Zusammenhänge von Wissenschaft und Gewalt
"Schaun" Sie Sem III
und vor allem: das "sexuelle" Thema der Urszene, die Inskription, die Einschreibung des Sexuellen in der Rede, Religion, Politik, Kunst und Wissenschaft; die "Geste" des Subjekts in der Sprachhalt(er)ung der Schrift der Abyss der Gesellschaft Sem Schauns Lachen und Heiterkeit
"Ein Text ist nur dann ein Text, wenn er dem ersten Blick,..., das Gesetz seiner Zusammensetzung und die Regel seines Spiels verbirgt. Ein Text bleibt im übrigen stets unwahrnehmbar."
"Die Verschleierung der Textur kann durchaus Jahrhunderte erfordern ihr Gewebe (toile) freizulegen." Derrida, Platons Pharmazie, in: Dissemination, S.71 (Wien 1995, Passagen Verlag)
( über ) Dekonstruktion kann man nicht sprechen man/frau muß "sie "(entweder) lesen. <<
2) in English
>> >> Open “Letter”
“Think” every word. “Silence exile cunning” our motto our choice our Joyce beyond dead ends like politics art religion. Big laugh in the displacement & condensation the mobility of syntax
“... to be able to read a text as a text, without mixing an interpretation in between, is the latest form of > inner experience < - perhaps an almost impossible one ...” ( Nietzsche, Aus dem Nachlaß der Achtzigerjahre; in: Werke III, ed. by Karl Schlechta, Mch. 1969, S.805)
Words to publishers, reviewers and other literary agents
The thought of “imminent” death, even if it should still be one ( 1 ), two (2) or more short decades away, makes me/us “ keep my/our distance” from events of a general nature such as presentations, congresses, symposia etc.
Perhaps you “tell” this to the journalists who will “be” present. Being an author does not have to mean literature management and in our case it certainly does not. Being an author “means” something like “being God” (cf. Thot). I give/gives “text”. From case to case this text “voice”; but never merely “face”, pré-“face”, presence.
A few “striking” references in the ff. Perhaps you would like to distribute copies to the literary mediators present and refer them to the “Preface” of Sem I. (And to the preface by Sem V !!!)
Or perhaps you would like to announce this yourself, there ? if I may refer you in all due brevity to the foreword, the preface of Sem I. Feed it to the journalists, even read it to them; refer them to the sections of J. Derrida's dissemination on the preface and to the relevant sections in
“Grammatotechne as the grammatology of the 'heart plants' or of incommunicability”
If you and the journalists take the words seriously, then you will “recognize” the program Semeion Aoristicon I -VII (see preface). That should be enough. Then the reading.
Incidentally: the “untraceability of the subject” Put Sem I, II, III, instead of us, in our place. Sub-version of a sub-specified subiect.
Author GACK with kind regards
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
P.S. Perhaps you also read the “simply” (before) probably you now turn away your ear, nevertheless: the preface, the préface, that which is before the face (=face), you read and you always read only the preface, the préface, which is everything.
You never see the face, what you see.
The completely dissolved subject in the mirror: Sem I, II, III beyond all literature Sem I, II, III ff. read this in front of the “face” of the journalists on “behalf” of the “author” “GACK” face á face
the intrigue of the plot
Inspector Sem and his family open all the word cases they are pursued and are on the right track themselves; the hiding concealing masking, the mask the prosopopoeia, the de-position;
all the tricks of an inspector and former private detective; the case of cases reaches its solution redemption;
through Sem Schaun and his “fa/mily”
“poster” for presentation
“Read” the connections between sex and religion
“ Show” Sem I
“Read” the connections between literature and writing
“ View” Sem II
“Read” the connections between science and violence
“ Examine” Sem III
and above all: of the “sexual” theme primal scene, the “sexual” theme of the primal scene the inscription, the inscription of the sexual in speech, religion, politics, art and science;
the “gesture” of the subject in the linguistic posture of writing the abyss of society Sem Schaun's laughter and merriment
“A text is only a text if it conceals from the first glance... the law of its composition and the rule of its play.
A text always remains imperceptible.”
“The concealment of the texture may well require centuries to uncover its fabric (toile).” Derrida, Plato's Pharmacy, in: Dissemination, p.71 (Vienna 1995, Passagen Verlag)
( about ) deconstruction one cannot speak one must read “it/her ”. << <<
- /S/E/M/EI/ON/ /A/OR/IST/I/CON V oder zur Autobiographie Sem Schauns. 2007 [Autor]
- S/E/M/EI/O/N/ /A/OR/IST/I/CON IV oder zur Autobiographie Sem Schauns. 2002 [Autor]
- S/E/M/EI/O/N/ /A/OR/IST/I/CON III oder zur Autobiographie Sem Schauns. 1996 [Autor]
- S/E/M/EI/O/N/ /A/OR/IST/I/CON I oder zur Autobiographie Sem Schauns. 1995 [Autor]
- S/E/M/EI/O/N/ /A/OR/IST/I/CON II oder zur Autobiographie Sem Schauns. 1994 [Autor]
Passagen Verlag Wien/Vienna
Title from:
Gerhard Anna Cončić-Kaučić
https://www.passagen.at/autoren/gerhard-a-concic-kaucic-1/
cf. also:
Gerhard Anna Cončić-Kaučić
Covid 19 Roman Text Welt Gedicht
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2020/04/covid-19-roman-text-welt-gedicht.html
Adventure Philosophy! AN ANNIVERSARY EVERY YEAR / LIVING CONSCIOUSLY EVERY YEAR ............... Adventure Philosophy ....... Adventure Life !!!
............................................. Grammatological practice, philosophical practice, philosophy, what is philosophy, understanding, desire, knotting, knots of life and writing and of life as writing, semiology becomes grammatology, philosophy as science, differ/a/nce, Socratism as stultification, theoria as the highest form of practice. .......................................................
Writing (cf. teaser), language, the sentence, the word. Every sentence is a leap!
Personal history and general history; language consciousness unconsciousness; what does this have to do with general history, experience, phenomenology (e.g. that of Merleau-Ponty), desire (e.g. Freud, e.g. Lacan, e.g. Melanie Klein), processing, reality, "psychic reality" (Freud) (?!) ..............................................................
LANGUAGE, THINKING, PHILOSOPHY, UBW: ............. HOSPITALITY PHILOSOPHICAL PRACTICE ......
Sprache, Denken, Philosophie, Ubw: ............. Gastfreundschaft Philosophische Praxis ......
SPRACHE, DENKEN, PHILOSOPHIE, UBW: ............. GASTFREUNDSCHAFT PHILOSOPHISCHE PRAXIS ...
……………………………………………………………………….. Gastfreundschaft Philosophische Praxis ……………………………………………………………………. ich versuche
............................................................................... I try to explain why I answer requests for lectures, seminars or discussions permanently and persistently (almost) in the negative; my grammatological philosophical practice requires deconstruction. ............................................................................................................................................................ And this requires ruthlessness, independence and the utmost attention! .......................................................................................................................................................................To a person to whom you want to be able to listen and whose words you want to be able to perceive, in all openness, to such a person you should want to and be able to develop a love, a passion, or at least an affection.
The body should not only not be ignored, but should be perceived and valued with an open mind - in all its frailty, fragility and vulnerability! ........................................................................................................................................................................................................Body also means voice, color of voice, tone of voice, rhythm, tempo, gesture, movement, face, eyes, looks, expression, etc. ............................................................. the body is something beautiful, - ............... .............................................................
(art shows us the body, as do traditional tribal cultures in Africa, Australia and America; people enjoy the body as text and often "describe" it with tattoos), ............................................................., - today
and in earlier cultures. .............................................................
The body is the basis for any structurality of successful intellectual intimacy of any philosophical practice as conversation.
PHILOSOPHICAL PRACTICE VIENNA PHILOSOPHICAL PRACTICE AUSTRIA PHILOSOPHICAL PRACTICE AUSTRIA EUROPE
Grammatological Philosophical Practice, Gerhard Kaucic / Djay PhilPrax & Anna Lydia Huber Vienna
Philosophical practitioners, grammatologists, authors, cyclists, ecomobilists, the philosopher as cyclist, the philosopher as bicyclist, the philosopher as traveler, the philosopher as agitated and mover, the philosopher as scout ....... track ....... trace ....... Grammatology ... Deconstruction
Freerider, enduro biker (s works), mountain biker, touring cyclist, Gerhard Kaučić / Djay PhilPrax (*1959), philosopher, , - philosophical practitioner, grammatologist, writer, author, - cyclist, mountain biker, racing cyclist, folding bike cyclist, ecomobilist, -
the philosopher as cyclist, the philosopher as bicyclist, the philosopher as traveler, the philosopher as agitated and mover, the philosopher as scout ....... track ....... trace ....... Grammatology .......... Deconstruction
If you are interested in a PP (Philosophical Practice) with me, please reserve an appointment only under this email: To contact us, please use only this email: gack[at]chello.at
Philosophers, Writers, Philosophical Practitioners, Mediators, Translators, Feminists, Freeriders, (Wild) Camping Enthusiasts, Survivors
Vienna
Philosophical Practice weltweit … rund um die Uhr … rund um die Welt, ... „face à face“, … confidential one-to-one conversation, … around the clock … around the world
Grammatological Philosophical Practice Dr. Gerhard Kaucic / Djay PhilPrax ( born 1959, author, philosopher, PP since 1989 ) Conversation, analysis, discourse, problematization, identity dislocation, subjectivation, formalization, folding, complication, aporia, deconstruction
Opening hours: Mon - Fri: 11 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Charge by arrangement
Conversations outdoor/indoor: grammatologies, contextualizations, analyses, complications, plurivalences, dependencies, interdependencies, grammars, aporias, deconstruction...around the clock...around the world...
...around the clock ...around the world...
TALKS are EVENTS as TEXT
cf. Jacques Derrida, Signatur Ereignis Kontext, - in: Randgänge der Philosophie, Vienna 1988, pp. 291-314 ( original French edition: Marges de la philosophie, Paris 1972 )
Translation into English, Gerhard Kaučić (Dr. phil., b. 1959), European Philosopher, Writer, Feminist, Translator, Freerider , European Philosopher, Philosophical Practice/Practical Philosophy, Language Analytic Philosophy, Deconstruction, PP Vienna, Austria, Europe
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
36 years Head of Philosophical Practice Gerhard Kaučić (Dr. phil.) & Anna Lydia Huber (MSc)
Philosophical Practice Vienna, G Kaučić & A L Huber 1989 ff.
Deconstruction enables the relationship to the Other, the relationship to the Other (perhaps) enables deconstruction. The encounter with the Other makes me responsible for the singularity of the Other. For the unpredictability of the Other in being different.
I try to take the other as the other is and I try to recognize what the other is or what it can tell me (could tell me about my otherness). The deconstructive mindset makes me different and an Other.
Perhaps I encounter the Other in a more “real” way, perhaps that means more honestly, perhaps more ethically(!). I'll give it a try.
G K & A L H To contact us use only this email: gack[at]chello.at
Gerhard Anna Concic-Kaucic (author, writer, philosophers, Vienna, Austria),
(“GACK” = Anna Lydia Huber and Gerhard Kaucic )
born 1959 in Austria, live in Vienna.
He grew up in Salzburg, she in Falkenhof (Mühlviertel), Linz (Upper Austria), he/she Paris and Zell am See and he as well as in Saalfelden am Steinernen Meer (Salzburg) and Kufstein (Tyrol).
Both studied comparative literature, history, philosophy and linguistics in Salzburg and Paris, writers and translators since 1983. Numerous adventure trips by bicycle.
1989 Founded a “Grammatological Philosophical Practice” in Salzburg, Obertrum am See and Vienna.
1989 ff. Publication of a ( grammatological ) journal ( Die Grüne F Abyss ) for literature, culture and politics.
Representative of “Viennese postmodernism”, a Viennese variant of “deconstruction” (Jacques Derrida). Narrator, poet, translator, novelist and cultural theorist.
Authors of a deconstruction novel playing on different levels of language, reality and consciousness ( Passagen Vlg. 7 vols. planned, vol. V published 2007 ).
Essays on topics such as writing, grammatology, feminism, cloning, ecology, Japan, Judaism, Arabic culture and literature, religion, Kabbalah, music, architecture, film, network society, sport, transportation, politics, sexuality, philosophical practice, literary theory, postmodernism, semiotics, rationalism, constructivism, deconstruction, différance, psychoanalysis, Kant, Hamann, Nietzsche, Freud, Wollschläger, Derrida, etc.
A big thank you to my practice visitors! 36 years of philosophical practice Gerhard Kaucic
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2019/12/groes-dankeschon-meine.html
Many thanks to my practice visitors! 36 Years of Philosophical Practice Gerhard Kaucic
( German / English )
Prices, fee / fee amount / costs / price by arrangement / Charge by arrangement
Payment: cash and invoice
Fee payment: cash and invoice
Confidential individual consultation
A conversation in my philosophical practice lasts 55 minutes and costs between 65 and 115 euros, depending on the social situation and the respective needs (keyword: indoor/outdoor).
A double session costs between 95 and 145 euros, depending on requirements. A three-hour session costs between 155 and 210 euros.
Setting, - confidential “single talk”, confidential “one-to-one conversation”
Up to two people can have a conversation with me. The fee is then calculated according to the number of participants.
Persons in need with a high level of interest are not charged a fee for the first three rounds.
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
[ Before you write to me/us, before you think about coming to us, please try to think and reflect in your own way: .........What is philosophy? ... What is philosophical ... “practice” ? .......What is it ? ....... What is “is” ? .... “What” “is” a “question” ? ...... What is its precondition?...What causes it?.... Where does it develop from? ... ...
Which “contexts” lead to what we call a “question”? ... Under what circumstances, in what situation, by whom, with what intentions and on the basis of what tacit and unquestioned presuppositions and on the basis of what retentions does what we call “questioning” or something like “the politics of questioning” arise? ) And ! - Is ... “thinking” ...asking !?...Does “philosophical practice” answer ... Questions...?...!... Does ... “Philosophy” ... to questions ? ...
“Derrière le miroir” (Jacques Derrida) ........” Semeion Aoristicon“.....” /S/E/M/EI/ON/ /A/OR/IST/I/CON/ “ (Concic-Kaucic) ]
An open letter to people who want to come to my Philosophical Practice :
Dear people ,
dear interested people ( to avoid misunderstandings ! ),
whoever is dreaming of coming to my practice, - I am not a life - coach ! I am not a “ life - coach ” ! ( life advisor / life consultant / life counsellor / lifestyle consultant / teacher )
I do not feel responsible for that ! With the request for understanding.
What happens in my philosophical practice ?
There are many practices and each one is different.
I do not see myself as a “life counselor” or coach.
My practice is more concerned with theory-saturated or at least theory-interested concerns and my task is to deconstruct these theories or their carriers (i.e. my conversation partners, clients or guests), i.e. among other things to lead these/their theories into aporia and thus to unlock the thinking of my conversation partners, which also means to free these people, who are usually very theory-trained, for something new.
Yours sincerely
Gerhard Kaucic
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
P.S.: Of course there are many philosophical practitioners who see themselves as “life counselors”.
I would prefer not to be a life-coach ! ( in variation and adaptation of H. Melville: “Bartleby, the Scrivener” )
30 Years Jubilee Philosophical Practice Gerhard Kaucic
in English:
A particularly frequently requested field of problematicity:
Explanation aa))) In addition to the topic of “euthanasia, self-determination, economy” (including the subjects of euthanasia, assistance, support in dying, active, passive, indirect euthanasia, assisted suicide, problematic issues, etc.).
Explanation ff.) :... ranks the topic “J. Derrida , grammatologist, philosopher, founder of deconstruction , incomprehension of his opponents, dis- and misunderstandings of his followers” and the corresponding sub-topic “ Sur:Life ! Food Nutrition Food Enjoyment Animal Consciousness Unconsciousness Ethics Reflection Possibilities Aporias Deconstruction” in my Grammatological Philosophical Practice in Vienna, - and beyond (worldwide), - at the top of the most requested fields of reflection and deconstruction.
Grammatological philosophical practice in Hamburg's Hotel Kempinski on the Alster (( Hamburg, views ! and insights as well as the view of insight and vivifying circumspection including the skyline as a topophotographic event “metropolis on the water”, - the feeling of creating space through the production of “timelessness of the unconscious” and an un/healthy portion of good tasting fried animal meat!)
One can always dream of the animal and the ego, the unconscious and the superior ego, desire, psychoanalysis and its ethics! Of the truth of revelation! From the “right to insight, or the invention of the other” (cf. J. Derrida in “Psyché”)) to “Jacques Derrida, founder of deconstruction, incomprehension of his opponents, dis- and misunderstandings of his followers” ( 07-2014 )
Blogpost: Was ist Philosophische Praxis? (I)Part 1
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.co.at/2015/12/was-ist-philosophische-praxis.html
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2015/12/was-ist-philosophische-praxis.html?m=1
Blogpost: Was ist Philosophische Praxis? (II) Part 2
Blogpost: Was ist Philosophische Praxis? (III) Part 3
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
Projects (more cf. blog)
Deconstruction and Philosophical Practice / Philosophical Practice as Deconstruction
The Machine The Man Cyborgs Deconstruction
The Religious Deconstruction Religion and Society
Europeanization Legal Policy Migration Policy Deconstruction, Migration, Politics, Community, Subjects, Relations, The Other
The Political Body and the Other The European Heritage
Film Denken Philosophischer Salon Gerhard Kaučić Djay PhilPrax Gasometer Wien
Tiere sehen Dich an. Dekonstruktion, Verantwortung. Dekonstruktion zum Komplex von Gewalt, Wahn, Traum, Tod und Verantwortung.
MASCHINE MENSCH Roboter Androiden Cyborgs als Subjekt Dekonstruktion
Sexismus und Sexismusdebatten. Begehren und Verantwortung.
Religion und Gesellschaft. Das Religiöse.
ENDURO Sport Fun Erhabenheit.
Jacques Derrida and the deconstruction as philosophical Practice.
Gastfreundschaft. Politik der Freundschaft.
Lebensfreude. Essen und Genießen! Wie ernähre ich mich richtig? Wie lebe ich richtig?
Gegenwartsphilosophie / Philosophische Praxis / Contemporary Philosophy
Autobiographie. "Derrière le miroir" (Jacques Derrida), " Semeion Aoristicon"..." /S/E/M/EI/ON/ /A/OR/IST/I/CON/ " (Concic-Kaucic)
Postmoderne / Wiener Postmoderne / Dekonstruktion.
Haß-Sprech, Haß-Rede, Haßgesellschaft, Haßpolitik. Demokratiefähigkeit.
Europeanization Legal Policy Migration Policy Deconstruction, Migration, Politics, Community, Subjects, Relations, The Other
The Political Body and the Other The European Heritage
Arzt und Patient und seine Krankheit
Hegel besser verstehen / Hegel heute
Beethoven heute
The Religious Deconstruction Religion and Society
The Machine The Man Cyborgs Deconstruction
Europäisierung Rechtspolitik Migrationspolitik Dekonstruktion
Affizierung Immunisierung Autoaffektion Autoimmunität
Der freie Wille / Free will / Bewußtsein / das Unbewußte
Schurken Russland Putinismus Schurkenstaat
Rogues, Russia, Putinism, rogue state, war, terror
Ästhetische Erfahrung Radphilosophie Freiheitserfahrung Grenzerfahrung(en)
Theorie Praxis Technik Philosophische Praxis
Suizid, Selbsttötung und Freitod Suizid ja/nein
Todesstrafe Strafrecht Gesellschaft Menschenwürde Menschenrechte
Der Westen, die Anderen. Die Aufklärung.
Musikalische Erfahrung / Musical experience Grammatologie Implikationen
Kant das unreine Denken Apokalypsis
Ausnahmezustand Coronavirus-Krise Freiheitsrechte
Philosophie des Hasses Philosophie des Neides
Wiener Postmoderne/Postmoderne
Recht und Gerechtigkeit Armut Reichtum Überreichtum
Peter Handke und der Nobelpreis für Literatur
Philosophische Praxis als Training
Deconstruction and Philosophical Practice / Philosophical Practice as Deconstruction
Haus der Geschichte Österreich
Dissemination, Dekonstruktion und Philosophische Praxis
différance / (Differänz)
Das Werk und die Wahrheit/Landschaft und Leib
Thesen aus der realen Welt von Flüchtlingen
Was die Rechte will
Grammatologie
Österreichische Philosophie der Gegenwart
Französische Philosophie der Gegenwart
Freiheit und Krise. Krise der Freiheit.
Zur Inauguration des US Präsidenten (elect) Donald Trump
Demokratie - Philosophie / Demokratiephilosophie
Tierphilosophie Demokratietheorie
Postanthropozän ( !? ) Philosophie und Praxis
Dekonstruktion. Was ist Dekonstruktion. (!)
In einen Dialog treten. Was ist ein Dialog?!
Hate Speech
Was ist Philosophische Praxis?
Das Attentat. Der Wahnsinn. Die Singularität.
Festung Europa Postkolonialismus Terrorismus Flüchtlinge
Poésie engagée Sprachruf Rufsprache
Übersetzung Sprachen Fremdsprachen Übersetzungstheorien
DDR - Diskurse Unrechtsstaat / Rechtsstaat
Heterozentrismus: "Sexualität Anti-Homosexualität
Israel Judentum Minderheiten Demokratiephilosophie Verfassung
Israels Gründungsmythos Shlomo Sand Die Erfindung des jüdischen Volkes
Identität und Wandel
Kabbalah und die Schrift. Schriftgeschichte. Schrifttheorien.
Zum Begriff der Schrift.
Die Grünen. Das Grüne. Grüne Parteipolitik. Der Abbyss.
Rassismus. Apartheid. Sexismus.
Kind. Erziehung. Psychoanalyse.
Kinderliteratur. Literatur. Kinderkunst. Kunst.
Gewalt und Strafe.
Flüchtlingspolitik. Finanzpolitik. Haßpolitik.
Geopolitik und Weltschrift. Derrida und der Schriftbegriff.
Différ a nce.
Ökonomie und Anökonomie.
Archiv Anarchiv Archivwissenschaft.
Demokratie. Ökonomie. Politik. Philosophie. Die Unberechenbarkeit.
Kontrasexuelle Performanz. Begehren. Queering.
Poptheorie. Kunsttheorie. Architekturtheorie. Politik der Freundschaft.
Was ist Philosophie. Wer denkt, was heißt denken/Denken.
Lehrt man denken. Lehrt man denkend. Lernt man Denken. Gedankengänge.
. Leben. Überleben Euthanasie. Selbstbestimmung. Ökonomie.
Allegorien des Lesens. Was heißt heute: Lesen!
Metaphorologie. Literatur. Sprache. Rhythmus. Tonart. Stimmung.
Rhetorik. Ästhetik. Semiologie. Grammatologie.
Grammatologie Grammatotechne Inkommunikabilität Différance
Lesbarkeit. Unlesbarkeit. Literarizität. Aporie. Aporetische Semantik.
Kino. Film. Geschwindigkeit.
Körper. Nacktheit. Zivilisation.
Das Werk und die Wahrheit / Landschaft und Leib
LEBENSRAUM, MACHT, DEMOKRATIE, GESCHLECHT, NACKTHEIT, KÖRPERPHILOSOPHIE, FREIHEIT
THE LIMITS OF MEDIATION, Enlightenment, PHILOSOPHY, PSYCHOANALYSIS
Psychoanalyse, Sprachanalytische Philosophie, das Unbewußte
Die Sprache, das Sprechen, das Unbewußte (Ubw)
Der Satz und die Philosophie
Sexism, racism, fascism, cultural-historical considerations and reflections on violence and gender, - limits of mediation, limits of enlightenment, limits of philosophy, limits of psychoanalysis, responsibility and legal consequences up to a necessary future change of legal philosophy and legislation under demand of applied psychoanalytic reflectories as deconstruction.
"Because I'm a Girl."
KÖRPERPHILOSOPHIE, SEXISMUS, RASSISMUS, FASCHISMUS, MACHTTHEORIEN, BEGEHREN, ANTHROPOLOGISCHE UND ÖKONOMISCH-POLITISCHE STRUKTURDEBATTEN, POLITIK, DEKONSTRUKTION
Körper Philosophie Körperphilosophie
das "eher" Nichtabbildbare !, bzw das Nichtabgebildete einer bildgrammatischen Stratifikationsebene in der Zeit
Fotografie, Photographieren, Abbilden, Bildung
Denken u. Kino, Semiologie, Sprache und Gedächtnis
Grammatologische Philosophische Praxis. Film und Schrift bzw Film als Text oder die Grammatologie der Affekte und die Lesbarkeit im Ich.
Völkerrecht(e) oder Machtpolitik und Geopolitik. Demokratiephilosophie im Kommen.
Velozität Volatilität Flüchtigkeit in der Zeit. Televisionen. Internet. Axiomatiken. Gedächtnis. Kultur.
Psychoanalyse und (Homo-) Sexualität; Ödipus und Antiödipus (Deleuze/Guattari); Freiheit Raumerkenntnis Demokratie Sexualität Bewegung Lust; Sexualpolitik Pädagogik Erkenntnis Singularität Individualität Demokratie
De Sade, Freud, Artaud, Genet, Goytisolo, Derrida, Tel quel, Nouveau Roman, Krieg, Leib, Gedächtnis, Archiv
Der freie Wille / Free will / Bewußtsein / das Unbewußte
Deconstruction Music Dekonstruktion Musikalische Erfahrung
more cf. blog !
Kontakt / Adresse:
Gerhard Kaucic / Djay PhilPrax (Dr. phil.) / Anna Lydia Huber (MSc)
Guglgasse 8
1110 Wien Oesterreich Europa
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
Philosophical Salon / Philosophical Lounge G Kaucic & AL Huber, Vienna ... Discourse room, study room, social room, work room, philosophical salon, philosophical lounge, philosophical practice Gerhard Kaučić / Djay PhilPrax (born 1959, Dr.phil.) & Anna Lydia Huber (born 1959, MSc) Gasometer City, Vienna
Philosophischer Salon/Philosophical Lounge G Kaucic & AL Huber Vienna, Austria, - Gerhard Kaučić (*1959), head of a philosophical practice for 36 years in Vienna ( 1989-2025 ff.)
Philosophical Salon / Philosophical Lounge G Kaucic & AL Huber, Vienna ... Discourse room, study room, social room, work room, philosophical salon, philosophical lounge, philosophical practice Gerhard Kaučić / Djay PhilPrax (born 1959, Dr.phil.) & Anna Lydia Huber (born 1959, MSc) Gasometer City, Vienna
Philosophical Salon / Philosophical Lounge G Kaucic & AL Huber, Vienna ... Discourse room, study room, social room, work room, philosophical salon, philosophical lounge, philosophical practice Gerhard Kaučić / Djay PhilPrax (born 1959, Dr.phil.) & Anna Lydia Huber (born 1959, MSc) Gasometer City, Vienna
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
Philosophie Wien / Philosophy Vienna Austria Europe
Contemporary Philosophy
Nicht vollständige Liste unserer Publikationen seit 1986 cf. „Google Scholar Profil“:
Gerhard Kaučić (Dr. phil.), Anna Lydia Huber (MSc) https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=de&user=wNUSN64AAAAJ oder
Non-complete overview of our publications since 1986 cf. "Google Scholar Profile":
Gerhard Kaučić (Dr. phil.), Anna Lydia Huber (MSc) https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=de&user=wNUSN64AAAAJ oder
https://web.archive.org/web/20250106202608/https://scholar.google.at/citations?user=wNUSN64AAAAJ&hl=de
VIAF:
Gerhard Anna Cončić-Kaučić
https://web.archive.org/web/20241213022311/https://viaf.org/viaf/59390636/
Wikidata:
Gerhard Anna Cončić-Kaučić
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3104047
https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q3104047&oldid=2102216011
LinkedIn Gerhard Kaučić:
36 years Head of a Philosophical Practice in Vienna, Austria, Europe
Philosophische Praxis, gegründet 1989, Dr. Gerhard Kaučić (*1959, Alter 66, 2025) , Philosophischer Praktiker, Gasometer B, Guglgasse 8, 1110 Wien, Austria / Österreich, Europa
Philosophische Praxis Gerhard Kaučić / Djay PhilPrax (Dr. phil.) & Anna Lydia Huber (MSc), geb. 1959, gemeinsamer Praxis-Sitz Wien (seit 1989 ff.) / joint practice location in Vienna
https://at.linkedin.com/in/gerhard-kau%C4%8Di%C4%87-2b6b9362
Homepage (Engl./Germ.):
Lebenslauf Biographie Gegenwartsphilosophie Philosophische Praxis
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2017/10/lebenslauf-biographie.html
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2017/10/lebenslauf-biographie.html?m=1
Biographisches, Bio, Vita, Biographie Philosoph:in
https://web.archive.org/web/20241224002106/https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2017/09/biographisches-bio-vita-biographie.html?m=1
Blogger Gerhard Kaučić / Anna Lydia Huber
https://www.blogger.com/profile/06298602217698385450 https://web.archive.org/web/20241224003917/https://www.blogger.com/profile/06298602217698385450 https://web.archive.org/web/20250105162953/https://www.blogger.com/profile/06298602217698385450
Unser Blog
Philosophical Practices / Politics / Disseminations Philosophische Praxis G Kaučić & AL Huber https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/
Philosophische Praxis als Training
https://web.archive.org/web/20241216103708/https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2019/09/philosophische-praxis-als-training.html
Philosophical Practice as/and Training work-free Education Humanity Future Human Being Democracy
Recht und Gerechtigkeit Armut Reichtum Überreichtum Demokratie Eine Sache der Demokratie (-philosophie)
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2019/11/law-and-justice-poverty-wealth.html
Freiheit und Krise. Krise der Freiheit.
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2017/03/freiheit-und-krise.html
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2017/03/freiheit-und-krise.html?m=1
The Machine The Man Robots Androids Cyborgs as subject Deconstruction
Grammatotechne als GrammatologIE oder von der Inkommunikabilität
The Religious Deconstruction Religion and Society
Das Religiöse Dekonstruktion Religion und Gesellschaft
Affliction Immunization Autoaffection Autoimmunity
The attack. The insanity. The singularity.
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2015/11/theattack.html
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2015/11/theattack.html?m=1
Theory Practice Technique Philosophical Practice as thinking and speaking
Aesthetic Experience Cycling Experience Freedom Experience Border Experience(es)
Europeanization Legal Policy Migration Policy Deconstruction
Deconstruction and Philosophical Practice / Philosophical Practice as Deconstruction
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2019/03/deconstruction-and-philosophical.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20241219003921/https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2019/03/deconstruction-and-philosophical.html?m=1
Österreichische Philosophie der Gegenwart (Germ. / Engl.)
Philosophie der Gegenwart / Zeitgenössische Philosophie
Philosophie des 21. Jahrhunderts / Philosophieren im 21. Jahrhundert
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2017/08/osterreichische-philosophie-der.html
Deconstruction Music Deconstruction Musical Experience Deconstruction
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/01/deconstruction-musical-experience.html
Politik Verwirrung Gewalt Physische Attacken Attentate
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/02/gewalt-politik-subjekt.html
Gewalt Politik Subjekt
Politik Verwirrung Gewalt Physische Attacken Attentate
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/02/gewalt-politik-subjekt.html?m=1
Violence Politics Subject
Politics Confusion Violence Physical attacks Assassinations
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/02/violence-politics-subject.html
Violence Politics Subject
Politics Confusion Violence Physical attacks Assassinations
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/02/violence-politics-subject.html?m=1
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
Philosophische Praxis
GESPRÄCHE sind EREIGNISSE als TEXT
Translation into English, Gerhard Kaučić (Dr. phil., b. 1959), European Philosopher, Writer, Feminist, Translator, Freerider , Europäischer Philosoph, Philosophische Praxis/Praktische Philosophie, Sprachanalytische Philosophie, Dekonstruktion, PP Wien, Österreich, Europa
Gerhard Kaučić, Alter 66, 2025, Anna Lydia Huber, age 66, 2025
Philosoph:in des Denkens der "différance" (cf. J. Derrida, La dissémination. Collection „Tel Quel“ aux Éditions du Seuil, Paris 1972)
To contact us please use only this email: g.kaucic[at]chello.at
Öffnungszeiten / Hours of opening: Mo – Fr: 11 - 20 Uhr
Honorar nach Vereinbarung / Charge by arrangement
Gespräche outdoor/indoor: Grammatologien, Kontextualisierungen, Analysen, Komplizierungen, Plurivalenzen, Dependenzen, Interdependenzen, Grammatiken, Aporien, Dekonstruktion...rund um die Uhr...rund um die Welt...
...around the clock ...around the world...
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
Gegenwartsphilosophie
Contemporary Philosophy
Gerhard Kaučić & Anna Lydia Huber ( geb. 1959 ) Philosophische Praxis 1989 ff.
Anna Lydia Huber
Philosophin, Feministin, Mediatorin, Autorin, Freerider:in, geboren 1959, MSc, Alter 66, 2025
( Mitarbeiterin in der grammatologisch-philosophischen Praxis seit 2009 in Wien und darüber hinaus )
( Associate in the grammatological-philosophical practice since 2009 in Vienna and beyond )
Gerhard Kaučić
Philosoph, Feminist, Mediator, Autor, Freerider, geboren 1959, Dr. phil., Alter 66, 2025
( Leiter (seit 1989) der Philosophischen Praxis Gerhard Kaučić (Dr. phil.) & Anna Lydia Huber (MSc) )
( Head (since 1989) of the Philosophical Practice Gerhard Kaučić (Dr. phil.) & Anna Lydia Huber (MSc) )
Gerhard Kaučić (Mountain Bikers, Freeriders, Turbo Levo s works) Anna Lydia Huber
Trailen auf den und auf dem Kahlenberg (Wien, Weidring, Klosterneuburg). Dornröschentrail, Südtiroler Uphill-Trail etc. Wir hatten einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr 2025. Ich hoff, Ihr auch.
We are trailing on the Kahlenberg. Dornröschentrail, South Tyrolean Uphill Trail etc. We had a good start to the year 2025. I hope you did too.
Gerhard Anna (66) up and down the Kahlenberg in fog and light snow flurries, - 3 degrees Celsius
Gerhard Kaučić (Mountain Bikers, Freeriders, Turbo Levo s works) Anna Lydia Huber
Trailen auf den und auf dem Kahlenberg. Dornröschentrail, Südtiroler Uphill-Trail etc. Wir hatten einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr 2025. Ich hoff, Ihr auch.
Gerhard Anna (66) auf den und auf dem Kahlenberg im Nebel und bei leichtem Schneegestöber, - 3 Grad Celsius
Trailen auf den und auf dem Kahlenberg (Wien). Dornröschentrail, Südtiroler Uphill-Trail etc. Wir hatten einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr 2025. Ich hoff, Ihr auch.
We are trailing on the Kahlenberg. Dornröschentrail, South Tyrolean Uphill Trail etc. We had a good start to the year 2025. I hope you did too.
Gerhard Anna (66) auf den und auf dem Kahlenberg im Nebel und bei leichtem Schneegestöber, - 3 Grad Celsius
Gerhard Anna (66) up and down the Kahlenberg in fog and light snow flurries, - 3 degrees Celsius
To contact us please use only this email: g.kaucic[at]chello.at
Winter-Biker / Winter bikers
Winter-Biker / Winter bikers
Gerhard Kaučić (Dr. phil., b. 1959), European Philosopher, Writer, Freerider
Winter-Biker:in / Winter bikers
Anna Lydia Huber (MSc, b. 1959), European Philosopher, Writer, Freerider
Gerhard Kaučić (Mountain Bikers, Freeriders, Turbo Levo s works) Anna Lydia Huber
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
Philosophische Praxis
GESPRÄCHE sind EREIGNISSE als TEXT
Translation into English, Gerhard Kaučić (Dr. phil., b. 1959), European Philosopher, Writer, Feminist, Translator, Freerider , Europäischer Philosoph, Philosophische Praxis/Praktische Philosophie, Sprachanalytische Philosophie, Dekonstruktion, PP Wien, Österreich, Europa
Gerhard Kaučić, Alter 66, 2025, Anna Lydia Huber, age 66, 2025
Philosoph:in des Denkens der "différance" (cf. J. Derrida, La dissémination. Collection „Tel Quel“ aux Éditions du Seuil, Paris 1972)
To contact us please use only this email: g.kaucic[at]chello.at
Öffnungszeiten / Hours of opening: Mo – Fr: 11 - 20 Uhr
Honorar nach Vereinbarung / Charge by arrangement
Gespräche outdoor/indoor: Grammatologien, Kontextualisierungen, Analysen, Komplizierungen, Plurivalenzen, Dependenzen, Interdependenzen, Grammatiken, Aporien, Dekonstruktion...rund um die Uhr...rund um die Welt...
...around the clock ...around the world...
Landschaft und Leib |
Landscape and body
Anna Lydia Huber (66, philosopher) & Gerhard Kaučić (66, philosopher)
Summer/winter bike tours 2024/25 (previous and following)
der Philosoph/die Philosophin als Radfahrer:in, die Philosophin/der Philosoph als Radfahrende, der Philosoph/die Philosophin als Fahrende, der Philosoph/die Philosophin als Bewegte und Bewegende, die Philosophin/der Philosoph als Scout ....... trace ....... Spur ....... Grammatologie .......... Dekonstruktion
the philosopher as cyclist, the philosopher as bicycle rider, the philosopher as traveler,
the philosopher as moved and moving,
the philosopher as scout ... .... ….. trace ....... trail ...... Grammatology .......
Deconstruction
To contact us, please use only these emails:
g.kaucic[at]chello[dot]at or gack[at]chello[dot]at
The concept of freedom and its freedoms
On the concept and comprehensibility of freedom
Freiheit und Krise. Krise der Freiheit
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2017/03/freiheit-und-krise.html
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2017/03/freiheit-und-krise.html?m=1
Freedom
Freedom for all
 |
Gerhard Kaučić and Anna Lydia Huber (born 1959, Philosophers) skating and classic cross-country skiing on the cross-country ski trail in Saalfelden am Steinernen Meer in January 2025
Freedom
Freedom for all
Gewalt Politik Subjekt
Politik Verwirrung Gewalt Physische
Attacken Attentate
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/02/gewalt-politik-subjekt.html
Gewalt Politik Subjekt
Politik Verwirrung Gewalt Physische
Attacken Attentate
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/02/gewalt-politik-subjekt.html?m=1
Violence Politics Subject
Politics Confusion Violence Physical attacks Assassinations
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/02/violence-politics-subject.html
Violence Politics Subject
Politics Confusion Violence Physical attacks Assassinations
https://disseminationsdjayphilpraxkaucic.blogspot.com/2025/02/violence-politics-subject.html?m=1
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen